domenica 31 gennaio 2021

George Smith Patton (1885 – 1945), lo sbarco in Sicilia e il massacro di settantatré soldati italiani, catturati il 14 luglio durante la battaglia per la conquista dell'aeroporto di "Santo Pietro" a Biscari (oggi Acate).

Il generale George Smith Patton era uno dei più energici comandanti statunitensi ed ebbe il comando della 7ª Armata impegnata nello sbarco in Sicilia del 10 luglio 1943. Prima dello sbarco aveva pubblicamente esortato i suoi uomini a non avere pietà: "Se si arrendono non badare alle mani alzate. Mira tra la terza e la quarta costola, poi spara. Si fottano, nessun prigioniero! È finito il momento di giocare, è ora di uccidere! Io voglio una divisione di killer, perché i killer sono immortali!". Nei giorni successivi allo sbarco avvennero diversi sanguinosi eccidi operati dalla settima armata statunitense. Il più atroce fu l'uccisione di settantatré soldati italiani, catturati il 14 luglio durante la battaglia per la conquista dell'aeroporto di "Santo Pietro" a Biscari (oggi Acate).
L'esecuzione fu compiuta dal sergente Horace West, che da solo uccise trentasei soldati italiani prigionieri, e dal plotone del capitano John Compton, che uccise trentasette italiani (West e Compton militavano, entrambi, nella 45ª Divisione). Questo terribile atto fu reso pubblico grazie a una denuncia fatta da un cappellano della 45ª Divisione, il colonnello William King e poi confermato dalle ripetute denunce inascoltate dell'unico sopravvissuto alla strage, il soldato Giuseppe Giannola.
La testimonianza del cappellano permise lo svolgersi di un regolare processo, dal quale emerse la colpevolezza del sergente Horace West che fu condannato all'ergastolo, ma non scontò neppure un anno. Il governo statunitense era infatti preoccupato dalla possibilità che l'immagine americana potesse essere compromessa, soprattutto davanti all'Italia, con la quale gli Stati Uniti avevano da poco concluso l'armistizio dell’8 settembre 1943.
Il capitano John Compton, che si difese dicendo di aver eseguito gli ordini di Patton, al contrario di West fu assolto dall'accusa di aver compiuto il massacro. È noto (attraverso dichiarazioni rilasciate da decine di soldati ed ufficiali, i quali testimoniarono al processo sui crimini di Biscari).


Parole inequivocabili, anche se ufficiali e soldati che avevano lavorato al fianco di Patton e avevano avuto modo di conoscerlo hanno affermato che non avrebbe mai ordinato un massacro.
È anche noto (da affermazioni contenute nel diario personale del generale) che Patton ritenesse i siciliani poco valorosi, vili e troppo arrendevoli. 


Ad esempio racconta nel libro Patton Generale d'acciaio a pagina 64 che "quando stavamo combattendo nelle vicinanze della città (Gela, ndr), gli abitanti erano, a dire il meno, poco amichevoli; ma da quando abbiamo dimostrato che eravamo in grado di battere sia i tedeschi, sia gli italiani, si sono perfettamente "americanizzati" e impiegano il loro tempo a chiederci sigarette". 


Non mancano però gli elogi al popolo italiano nel suo complesso. Al vicario del cardinale disse "sono rimasto sconcertato della testardaggine e dal coraggio degli italiani; testardi perché combattono per una causa persa, coraggiosi perché italiani". Gli episodi e i giudizi espressi da Patton sono molti e sempre influenzati dalle circostanze, e la strage resta. 


La spedizione in Sicilia si concluse il 17 agosto del 1943 quando lo sconfitto esercito tedesco abbandonò l'isola e si ritirò in Calabria.






George Smith Patton (San Gabriel, 11 novembre 1885 – Heidelberg, 21 dicembre 1945) è stato un generale statunitense durante la seconda guerra mondiale e un grande esperto nell'impiego dei mezzi corazzati. Dotato di una solida personalità, determinato e risoluto, a volte eccessivamente impulsivo ed eccentrico, dimostrò grande capacità di comando e notevole preparazione strategica durante la campagna di Sicilia e soprattutto sul fronte occidentale nel 1944-45, guidando con grande energia le sue truppe in una serie di brillanti vittorie fino al cuore della Germania. La risolutezza e la determinazione gli valsero il soprannome di "generale d'acciaio".
I russi lo chiamavano "generale dopo" perché assonante (потом, pron. patóm). All'apice della carriera amava girare con un revolver Colt SAA dall'impugnatura in avorio e una cintura da cowboy fuori ordinanza, funzionale alla costruzione mediatica del personaggio-guerriero che egli amava interpretare.


Biografia

Gli inizi

George Smith Patton nacque a San Gabriel, un sobborgo di Los Angeles, in California, l'11 novembre 1885; proveniva da una ricca famiglia della Virginia di antica tradizione militare; suo nonno, durante la Guerra di secessione, colonnello confederato George S. Patton, Sr. era morto nel 1864 nella Terza battaglia di Winchester. Il pro-zio, il tenente colonnello confederato Waller T. Patton era morto durante la carica di Pickett nella battaglia di Gettysburg del 1863.
Nel 1909 il giovane George uscì ufficiale di cavalleria dall'accademia militare di West Point, dove era entrato all'età di quattordici anni.
Nel 1912 il giovane Patton partecipò alla V Olimpiade a Stoccolma nella gara di pentathlon moderno, inserita per la prima volta nel programma olimpico. Iniziò con un modesto ventesimo posto nella prova di tiro (150 punti su 200), ma recuperò posizioni nelle prove successive. Fu settimo nel nuoto (300 metri in 5'55"6), quarto nella scherma (20 scontri vinti e sole 4 sconfitte), sesto nell'equitazione (percorso netto di 5 km e 17 ostacoli in 10'42") ed infine terzo nella corsa (4000 metri in 20'01"9). Nella classifica finale fu quinto, dietro a quattro atleti svedesi.
Acquisì una certa esperienza militare al fianco del generale John Joseph Pershing, nella campagna del Messico (1916-1917) contro Pancho Villa. Durante la spedizione contro Pancho Villa, in un conflitto a fuoco uccise Julio Cardenas – il braccio destro di Villa – montando una mitragliatrice su una macchina (così nacque la sua ammirazione verso l'utilizzo delle unità meccanizzate in guerra); e fu promosso capitano. Seguì Pershing anche quando fu a capo della spedizione americana in Europa, allo scoppio della prima guerra mondiale. In Europa accumulò conoscenze sull'utilizzo dei carri armati.


Operazione Torch e campagna di Tunisia

Nel 1939 fu promosso tenente colonnello; l'anno seguente, allo scoppio della seconda guerra mondiale, divenne Maggiore Generale e, dopo aver conseguito alcune specializzazioni (ancora nell'uso dei mezzi corazzati), nel 1941, fu messo a capo della 2ª Divisione corazzata e nel 1942 prese parte all'operazione Torch, dirigendo lo sbarco in Marocco alla testa della cosiddetta Western Task Force. Rimase in Marocco per organizzare il I Corpo d'armata corazzato in preparazione dello sbarco in Sicilia, ma, dopo il disastro della battaglia del passo di Kasserine, fu incaricato dal generale Dwight Eisenhower del comando, dal 6 marzo 1943 delle forze americane in Tunisia, raggruppate nel II corpo d'armata, al posto del generale Lloyd Fredendall.
Il generale dimostrò subito estrema risolutezza, riuscì a riorganizzare le sue forze e sollevare il morale delle truppe molto scosso dopo la serie di sconfitte, ma non ottenne grandi risultati. Il II corpo d'armata passò all'offensiva il 17 marzo 1943 ma i ripetuti attacchi alla stretta di Maknassy, dal 23 al 25 marzo, furono respinti dai tedeschi nonostante la superiorità di uomini e mezzi degli americani. Patton riuscì a respingere un contrattacco di panzer ad El Guettar il 24 marzo, ma una nuova serie di attacchi a Fondouk e a El Guettar il 27 e 28 marzo, terminarono con pesanti perdite e scarsi risultati; i difensori italo-tedeschi mantennero le loro posizioni[2]. Comandò il ricongiungimento delle forze statunitensi con quelle dell'8ª Armata britannica di Bernard Law Montgomery. Tra i suoi più stretti collaboratori in questa fase della guerra c'era l'allora maggiore Generale Omar Bradley.


La campagna di Normandia e la fine della guerra

Patton fu richiamato in Gran Bretagna; fu messo a capo della 3ª Armata alcune settimane dopo lo sbarco in Normandia avvenuto il 6 giugno del 1944; durante la battaglia di Normandia si distinse in maniera particolare nelle operazioni di conquista di alcune importanti città francesi come Nantes, Orléans, Avranches, Nancy e Metz. Respinse in maniera esemplare la controffensiva tedesca delle Ardenne, (16 dicembre 1944), contrattaccando e mettendo in fuga l'esercito tedesco. Riprese l'avanzata e, superato il Reno, si spinse fino a Plzeň, al confine cecoslovacco; qui l'ordine diretto del generale Dwight Eisenhower gli impedì di continuare l'avanzata verso Praga che fu invece raggiunta dalle armate corazzate sovietiche del maresciallo Ivan Konev l'11 maggio 1945, costringendolo a fermarsi e a congiungersi con le truppe sovietiche provenienti dall'Austria, le forze del 3° Fronte Ucraino del maresciallo Fedor Tolbuchin.
Sulla questione gli storici discutono ancora e, a dispetto di dietrologi che ancora imputano ad Eisenhower una certa "mollezza" politica per aver voluto evitare frizioni con l'alleato sovietico, la maggior parte degli storici ritiene che la sua avanzata avrebbe creato un grave e pericoloso squilibrio nella linea strategica attentamente tracciata e fatta eseguire da Eisenhower, noto per le sue grandi capacità di organizzatore e stratega.
Suscitò discussioni la sua decisione di non trattare i prigionieri di guerra delle Schutzstaffeln diversamente dagli altri, asserendo che tale corpo era diventato troppo numeroso nel corso della guerra per essere diverso dagli altri eserciti. Altrove dichiarò di essere caldamente a favore di un'azione congiunta anglo-americana e tedesca in funzione anti-sovietica, dal momento che a suo dire l'URSS non avrebbe avuto motivo di restare in rapporti amichevoli con l'Occidente una volta crollato il Reich.
Sembra che Patton fosse convinto dell'inevitabilità di una guerra contro i sovietici, che ipotizzasse di riarmare subito l'esercito tedesco per impiegarlo accanto agli eserciti anglo-americani e che auspicasse un attacco immediato all'Armata Rossa; egli credeva ottimisticamente di "ricacciare quei dannati russi a Mosca in tre mesi". Patton riteneva pure che gli ebrei si sarebbero opposti ad un'alleanza con i tedeschi e che provassero simpatia per l'Unione Sovietica. Egli avrebbe affermato che l'"influenza semitica nella stampa" mirava a "promuovere il comunismo". Dichiarazioni di questo tenore suscitarono polemiche e favorirono la destituzione del generale da incarichi operativi di comando. Patton fu amareggiato per non aver ricevuto alcun incarico nelle ultime fasi della Guerra del Pacifico, e si rassegnò al suo ruolo di amministratore militare della Baviera.


La morte

Il 9 dicembre 1945, mentre si dirigeva ad una battuta di caccia, rimase coinvolto in un incidente stradale nei pressi di Spira; ad un incrocio la sua macchina si scontrò con un autocarro dell'esercito americano; nessuno rimase ferito tranne Patton, che, seduto sul sedile posteriore, fu sbalzato in avanti ed urtò violentemente la testa sul sedile anteriore, rompendosi l'osso del collo. Pur avendo riportato irreversibili e gravi traumi, riuscì a sopravvivere tra atroci sofferenze altri dieci giorni. Mentre sembrava che le condizioni si fossero ristabilite, morì di edema polmonare e congestione cardiaca, alle 17.45 del 21 dicembre 1945, all'età di sessant'anni. La sua morte ha originato ipotesi di un complotto per eliminarlo, a garanzia del patto di Jalta.
Venne sepolto, secondo le sue volontà, nel cimitero americano del Lussemburgo, insieme agli altri soldati caduti nell'offensiva delle Ardenne.


Filmografia

La figura del generale Patton è stata riportata sullo schermo nei film:
Patton, generale d'acciaio (Patton) (1970), film statunitense di Franklin J. Schaffner, con George C. Scott nella parte del generale
Obiettivo Brass (Brass Target) (1978), film statunitense di John Hough, con George Kennedy nella parte del generale
In guerra per amore (2016), film italiano di Pif, con Forest Baker nella parte del generale.

ENGLISH

George Smith Patton Jr. (November 11, 1885 – December 21, 1945) was a controversial general in the United States Army who commanded the Seventh United States Army in the Mediterranean theater of World War II, and the United States Army Central in France and Germany after the Allied invasion of Normandy in June 1944.
Born in 1885, Patton attended the Virginia Military Institute and the United States Military Academy at West Point. He studied fencing and designed the M1913 Cavalry Saber, more commonly known as the "Patton Saber", and competed in modern pentathlon in the 1912 Summer Olympics in Stockholm, Sweden.
Patton first saw combat during 1916's Pancho Villa Expedition, America's first military action using motor vehicles. He saw action in World War I as part of the new United States Tank Corps of the American Expeditionary Forces: he commanded the U.S. tank school in France, then led tanks into combat and was wounded near the end of the war. In the interwar period, Patton became a central figure in the development of the army's armored warfare doctrine, serving in numerous staff positions throughout the country. At the American entry into World War II, he commanded the 2nd Armored Division.
Patton led U.S. troops into the Mediterranean theater with an invasion of Casablanca during Operation Torch in 1942, and soon established himself as an effective commander by rapidly rehabilitating the demoralized II United States Corps. He commanded the U.S. Seventh Army during the Allied invasion of Sicily, where he was the first Allied commander to reach Messina. There he was embroiled in controversy after he slapped two shell-shocked soldiers, and was temporarily removed from battlefield command. He then was assigned a key role in Operation Fortitude, the Allies' disinformation campaign for Operation Overlord. At the start of the Western Allied invasion of France, Patton was given command of the Third Army, which conducted a highly successful rapid armored drive across France. Under his decisive leadership, the Third Army took the lead in relieving beleaguered American troops at Bastogne during the Battle of the Bulge, after which his forces drove deep into Nazi Germany by the end of the war.
During the Allied occupation of Germany, Patton was named military governor of Bavaria, but was relieved for making aggressive statements towards the Soviet Union and trivializing denazification. He commanded the United States Fifteenth Army for slightly more than two months. Severely injured in an auto accident, he died in Germany twelve days later, on December 21, 1945.
Patton's colorful image, hard-driving personality and success as a commander were at times overshadowed by his controversial public statements. His philosophy of leading from the front, and his ability to inspire troops with attention-getting, vulgarity-ridden speeches, such as his famous address to the Third Army, was met favorably by his troops, but much less so by a sharply divided Allied high command. His sending the doomed Task Force Baum to liberate his son-in-law, Lieutenant Colonel John K. Waters from a prisoner of war camp further damaged his standing with his superiors. His emphasis on rapid and aggressive offensive action nonetheless proved effective, and he was regarded highly by his opponents in the German High Command. An award-winning biographical film released in 1970, Patton, helped popularize his image.

Early life

George Smith Patton Jr. was born on November 11, 1885, in the Los Angeles suburb of San Gabriel, California, to George Smith Patton Sr. and his wife Ruth Wilson, the daughter of Benjamin Davis Wilson. Patton had a younger sister, Anne, who was nicknamed "Nita."
As a child, Patton had difficulty learning to read and write, but eventually overcame this and was known in his adult life to be an avid reader. He was tutored from home until the age of eleven, when he was enrolled in Stephen Clark's School for Boys, a private school in Pasadena, for six years. Patton was described as an intelligent boy and was widely read on classical military history, particularly the exploits of Hannibal, Scipio Africanus, Julius Caesar, Joan of Arc, and Napoleon Bonaparte, as well as those of family friend John Singleton Mosby, who frequently stopped by the Patton family home when George was a child. He was also a devoted horseback rider.
Patton married Beatrice Banning Ayer, the daughter of Boston industrialist Frederick Ayer, on May 26, 1910, in Beverly Farms, Massachusetts. They had three children, Beatrice Smith (born March 1911), Ruth Ellen (born February 1915), and George Patton IV (born December 1923). Beatrice Patton died in 1953 when she was thrown from her horse.
Patton never seriously considered a career other than the military. At the age of seventeen he sought an appointment to the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York. He applied to several universities with Reserve Officer's Training Corps programs, and was accepted to Princeton College, but eventually decided on Virginia Military Institute (VMI), which his father and grandfather had attended. He attended the school from 1903 to 1904 and, though he struggled with reading and writing, performed exceptionally in uniform and appearance inspection as well as military drill. While he was at VMI, a senator from California nominated him for West Point. He was an initiate of the Beta Commission of Kappa Alpha Order.
In his plebe (first) year at West Point, Patton adjusted easily to the routine. However, his academic performance was so poor that he was forced to repeat his first year after failing mathematics. He excelled at military drills though his academic performance remained average. He was cadet sergeant major during his junior year, and the cadet adjutant his senior year. He also joined the football team, but he injured his arm and stopped playing on several occasions. Instead he tried out for the sword team and track and field and specialized in the modern pentathlon. He competed in this sport in the 1912 Summer Olympics in Stockholm, and he finished in fifth place—right behind four Swedes.
Patton graduated number 46 out of 103 cadets at West Point on June 11, 1909, and received a commission as a second lieutenant in the Cavalry branch of the United States Army.

Ancestry

The Patton family was of Irish, Scots-Irish, English, Scottish, French and Welsh ancestry. His great-grandmother came from an aristocratic Welsh family, descended from many Welsh lords of Glamorgan, which had an extensive military background. Patton believed he had former lives as a soldier and took pride in mystical ties with his ancestors. Though not directly descended from George Washington, Patton traced some of his English colonial roots to George Washington's great-grandfather. He was also descended from England's King Edward I through Edward's son Edmund of Woodstock, 1st Earl of Kent. Family belief held the Pattons were descended from sixteen barons who had signed Magna Carta. Patton believed in reincarnation, stating that he had fought in previous battles and wars before his time, additionally, his ancestry was very important to him, forming a central part of his personal identity. The first Patton in America was Robert Patton, born in Ayr, Scotland. He emigrated to Culpeper, Virginia, from Glasgow, in either 1769 or 1770. His paternal grandfather was George Smith Patton, who commanded the 22nd Virginia Infantry under Jubal Early in the Civil War and was killed in the Third Battle of Winchester, while his great-uncle Waller T. Patton was killed in Pickett's Charge during the Battle of Gettysburg. Patton also descended from Hugh Mercer, who had been killed in the Battle of Princeton during the American Revolution. Patton's father, who graduated from the Virginia Military Institute (VMI), became a lawyer and later the district attorney of Los Angeles County. Patton's maternal grandfather was Benjamin Davis Wilson, a merchant who had been the second Mayor of Los Angeles. His father was a wealthy rancher and lawyer who owned a one-thousand-acre (400 ha) ranch near Pasadena, California. Patton is also a descendant of French Huguenot Louis DuBois.

Junior officer

Patton's first posting was with the 15th Cavalry at Fort Sheridan, Illinois, where he established himself as a hard-driving leader who impressed superiors with his dedication. In late 1911, Patton was transferred to Fort Myer, Virginia, where many of the Army's senior leaders were stationed. Befriending Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, Patton served as his aide at social functions on top of his regular duties as quartermaster for his troop.

1912 Olympics

For his skill in running and fencing, Patton was selected as the Army's entry for the first modern pentathlon at the 1912 Olympic Games in Stockholm, Sweden. Patton was the only American among the 42 pentathletes, who were all military officers. Patton placed twenty-first on the pistol range, seventh in swimming, fourth in fencing, sixth in the equestrian competition, and third in the footrace, finishing fifth overall and first among the non-Swedish competitors. There was some controversy concerning his performance in the pistol shooting competition, in which he used a .38 caliber U.S. Army–issue pistol while most of the other competitors chose .22 caliber firearms. He claimed that the holes in the paper from his early shots were so large that a later bullet passed through them, but the judges decided that one of his bullets missed the target completely. Modern competitions on this level frequently now employ a moving backdrop specifically to track multiple shots through the same hole. If his assertion was correct, Patton would likely have won an Olympic medal in the event. The judges' ruling was upheld. Patton's only comment on the matter was:
The high spirit of sportsmanship and generosity manifested throughout speaks volumes for the character of the officers of the present day. There was not a single incident of a protest or any unsportsmanlike quibbling or fighting for points which I may say, marred some of the other civilian competitions at the Olympic Games. Each man did his best and took what fortune sent them like a true soldier, and at the end we all felt more like good friends and comrades than rivals in a severe competition, yet this spirit of friendship in no manner detracted from the zeal with which all strove for success.

Sword design

Following the 1912 Olympics, Patton travelled to Saumur, France, where he learned fencing techniques from Adjutant Charles Cléry, a French "master of arms" and instructor of fencing at the cavalry school there. Bringing these lessons back to Fort Myer, Patton redesigned saber combat doctrine for the U.S. cavalry, favoring thrusting attacks over the standard slashing maneuver and designing a new sword for such attacks. He was temporarily assigned to the Office of the Army Chief of Staff, and in 1913, the first 20,000 of the Model 1913 Cavalry Saber—popularly known as the "Patton saber"—were ordered. Patton then returned to Saumur to learn advanced techniques before bringing his skills to the Mounted Service School at Fort Riley, Kansas, where he would be both a student and a fencing instructor. He was the first Army officer to be designated "Master of the Sword", a title denoting the school's top instructor in swordsmanship. Arriving in September 1913, he taught fencing to other cavalry officers, many of whom were senior to him in rank. Patton graduated from this school in June 1915. He was originally intended to return to the 15th Cavalry, which was bound for the Philippines. Fearing this assignment would dead-end his career, Patton travelled to Washington, D.C. during 11 days of leave and convinced influential friends to arrange a reassignment for him to the 8th Cavalry at Fort Bliss, Texas, anticipating that instability in Mexico might boil over into a full-scale civil war. In the meantime, Patton was selected to participate in the 1916 Summer Olympics, but that olympiad was cancelled due to World War I.

Pancho Villa Expedition

In 1915 Lieutenant Patton was assigned to border patrol duty with A Troop of the 8th Cavalry, based in Sierra Blanca. During his time in the town, Patton took to wearing his M1911 Colt .45 in his belt rather than a holster. His firearm discharged accidentally one night in a saloon, so he swapped it for an ivory-handled Colt Single Action Army revolver, a weapon that would later become an icon of Patton's image.
In March 1916 Mexican forces loyal to Pancho Villa crossed into New Mexico and raided the border town of Columbus. The violence in Columbus killed several Americans. In response, the U.S. launched the Pancho Villa Expedition into Mexico. Chagrined to discover that his unit would not participate, Patton appealed to expedition commander John J. Pershing, and was named his personal aide for the expedition. This meant that Patton would have some role in organizing the effort, and his eagerness and dedication to the task impressed Pershing. Patton modeled much of his leadership style after Pershing, who favored strong, decisive actions and commanding from the front. As an aide, Patton oversaw the logistics of Pershing's transportation and acted as his personal courier.
In mid-April, Patton asked Pershing for the opportunity to command troops, and was assigned to Troop C of the 13th Cavalry to assist in the manhunt for Villa and his subordinates. His initial combat experience came on May 14, 1916 in what would become the first motorized attack in the history of U.S. warfare. A force under his command of ten soldiers and two civilian guides with the 6th Infantry in three Dodge touring cars surprised three of Villa's men during a foraging expedition, killing Julio Cárdenas and two of his guards. It was not clear if Patton personally killed any of the men, but he was known to have wounded all three. The incident garnered Patton both Pershing's good favor and widespread media attention as a "bandit killer". Shortly after, he was promoted to first lieutenant while a part of the 10th Cavalry on May 23, 1916. Patton remained in Mexico until the end of the year. President Woodrow Wilson forbade the expedition from conducting aggressive patrols deeper into Mexico, so it remained encamped in the Mexican border states for much of that time. In October Patton briefly retired to California after being burned by an exploding gas lamp. He returned from the expedition permanently in February 1917.

World War I

After the Villa Expedition, Patton was detailed to Front Royal, Virginia, to oversee horse procurement for the Army, but Pershing intervened on his behalf. After the United States entered World War I, and Pershing was named commander of the American Expeditionary Force (AEF) on the Western Front, Patton requested to join his staff. Patton was promoted to captain on May 15, 1917 and left for Europe, among the 180 men of Pershing's advance party which departed May 28 and arrived in Liverpool, England, on June 8. Taken as Pershing's personal aide, Patton oversaw the training of American troops in Paris until September, then moved to Chaumont and was assigned as a post adjutant, commanding the headquarters company overseeing the base. Patton was dissatisfied with the post and began to take an interest in tanks, as Pershing sought to give him command of an infantry battalion. While in a hospital for jaundice, Patton met Colonel Fox Conner, who encouraged him to work with tanks instead of infantry.
On November 10, 1917 Patton was assigned to establish the AEF Light Tank School. He left Paris and reported to the French Army's tank training school at Champlieu near Orrouy, where he drove a Renault FT light tank. On November 20, the British launched an offensive towards the important rail center of Cambrai, using an unprecedented number of tanks. At the conclusion of his tour on December 1, Patton went to Albert, 30 miles (48 km) from Cambrai, to be briefed on the results of this attack by the chief of staff of the British Tank Corps, Colonel J. F. C. Fuller. On the way back to Paris, he visited the Renault factory to observe the tanks being manufactured. Patton was promoted to major on January 26, 1918. He received the first ten tanks on March 23, 1918 at the tank school at Bourg, a small village close to Langres, Haute-Marne département. The only US soldier with tank-driving experience, Patton personally backed seven of the tanks off the train. In the post, Patton trained tank crews to operate in support of infantry, and promoted its acceptance among reluctant infantry officers. He was promoted to lieutenant colonel on April 3, 1918, and attended the Command and General Staff College in Langres.
In August 1918, he was placed in charge of the U.S. 1st Provisional Tank Brigade (redesignated the 304th Tank Brigade on November 6, 1918). Patton's Light Tank Brigade was part of Colonel Samuel Rockenbach's Tank Corps, part of the American First Army. Personally overseeing the logistics of the tanks in their first combat use by U.S. forces, and reconnoitering the target area for their first attack himself, Patton ordered that no U.S. tank be surrendered. Patton commanded American-crewed Renault FT tanks at the Battle of Saint-Mihiel, leading the tanks from the front for much of their attack, which began on September 12. He walked in front of the tanks into the German-held village of Essey, and rode on top of a tank during the attack into Pannes, seeking to inspire his men.
Patton's brigade was then moved to support U.S. I Corps in the Meuse-Argonne Offensive on September 26. He personally led a troop of tanks through thick fog as they advanced 5 miles (8 km) into German lines. Around 09:00, Patton was wounded while leading six men and a tank in an attack on German machine guns near the town of Cheppy. His orderly, Private First Class Joe Angelo, saved Patton, for which he was later awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. Patton commanded the battle from a shell hole for another hour before being evacuated. Although the 35th Division (of which Patton's tank troop was a component) eventually captured Varennes, it did so with heavy losses. Trying to move his reserve tanks forward and losing control of his temper, Patton is quoted as potentially having murdered one of his own men, stating: "Some of my reserve tanks were stuck by some trenches. So I went back and made some Americans hiding in the trenches dig a passage. I think I killed one man here. He would not work so I hit him over the head with a shovel".
Patton stopped at a rear command post to submit his report before heading to a hospital. Sereno E. Brett, commander of the U.S. 326th Tank Battalion, took command of the brigade in Patton's absence. Patton wrote in a letter to his wife: "The bullet went into the front of my left leg and came out just at the crack of my bottom about two inches to the left of my rectum. It was fired at about 50 m so made a hole about the size of a [silver] dollar where it came out."
While recuperating from his wound, Patton was brevetted to colonel in the Tank Corps of the U.S. National Army on October 17. He returned to duty on October 28 but saw no further action before hostilities ended on his 33rd birthday with the armistice of November 11, 1918. For his actions in Cheppy, Patton received the Distinguished Service Cross. For his leadership of the brigade and tank school, he was awarded the Distinguished Service Medal. He was also awarded the Purple Heart for his combat wounds after the decoration was created in 1932.

Inter-war years

Patton left France for New York City on March 2, 1919. After the war, he was assigned to Camp Meade, Maryland, and reverted to his permanent rank of captain on June 30, 1920, though he was promoted to major again the next day. Patton was given temporary duty in Washington D.C. that year to serve on a committee writing a manual on tank operations. During this time he developed a belief that tanks should be used not as infantry support, but rather as an independent fighting force. Patton supported the M1919 tank design created by J. Walter Christie, a project which was shelved due to financial considerations. While on duty in Washington, D.C., in 1919, Patton met Dwight D. Eisenhower, who would play an enormous role in Patton's future career. During and following Patton's assignment in Hawaii, he and Eisenhower corresponded frequently. Patton sent Eisenhower notes and assistance to help him graduate from the General Staff College. With Christie, Eisenhower, and a handful of other officers, Patton pushed for more development of armored warfare in the interwar era. These thoughts resonated with Secretary of War Dwight Davis, but the limited military budget and prevalence of already-established Infantry and Cavalry branches meant the U.S. would not develop its armored corps much until 1940.
On September 30, 1920, then-Major Patton relinquished command of the 304th Tank Brigade and was reassigned to Fort Myer as commander of 3rd Squadron, 3rd Cavalry. Loathing duty as a peacetime staff officer, he spent much time writing technical papers and giving speeches on his combat experiences at the General Staff College.
In July 1921 Patton became a member of the American Legion Tank Corps Post No. 19. From 1922 to mid-1923 he attended the Field Officer's Course at the Cavalry School at Fort Riley, then he attended the Command and General Staff College from mid-1923 to mid-1924, graduating 25th out of 248. In August 1923, Patton saved several children from drowning when they fell off a yacht during a boating trip off Salem, Massachusetts. He was awarded the Silver Lifesaving Medal for this action. He was temporarily appointed to the General Staff Corps in Boston, Massachusetts, before being reassigned as G-1 and G-2 of the Hawaiian Division at Schofield Barracks in Honolulu in March 1925.
Patton was made G-3 of the Hawaiian Division for several months, before being transferred in May 1927 to the Office of the Chief of Cavalry in Washington, D.C., where he began to develop the concepts of mechanized warfare. A short-lived experiment to merge infantry, cavalry and artillery into a combined arms force was cancelled after U.S. Congress removed funding. Patton left this office in 1931, returned to Massachusetts and attended the Army War College, becoming a "Distinguished Graduate" in June 1932.
In July 1932, Patton (still a Major) was executive officer of the 3rd Cavalry, which was ordered to Washington by Army Chief of Staff General Douglas MacArthur. Patton took command of the 600 troops of the 3rd Cavalry, and on July 28, MacArthur ordered Patton's troops to advance on protesting veterans known as the "Bonus Army" with tear gas and bayonets. Patton was dissatisfied with MacArthur's conduct, as he recognized the legitimacy of the veterans' complaints and had himself earlier refused to issue the order to employ armed force to disperse the veterans. Patton later stated that, though he found the duty "most distasteful", he also felt that putting the marchers down prevented an insurrection and saved lives and property. He personally led the 3rd Cavalry down Pennsylvania Avenue, dispersing the protesters. Patton also encountered his former orderly, Joe Angelo, as one of the marchers and forcibly ordered him away, fearing such a meeting might make the headlines.
Patton was promoted to lieutenant colonel in the regular Army on March 1, 1934, and was transferred to the Hawaiian Division in early 1935 to serve as G-2. Patton followed the growing hostility and conquest aspirations of the militant Japanese leadership. He wrote a plan to intern the Japanese living in the islands in the event of an attack as a result of the atrocities carried out by Japanese soldiers on the Chinese in the Sino-Japanese war. In 1937 he wrote a paper with the title "Surprise" which predicted, with what D'Este termed "chilling accuracy", a surprise attack by the Japanese on Hawaii. Depressed at the lack of prospects for new conflict, Patton took to drinking heavily and allegedly began a brief affair with his 21-year-old niece by marriage, Jean Gordon. This supposed affair distressed his wife and nearly resulted in their separation. Patton's attempts to win her back were said to be among the few instances in which he willingly showed remorse or submission.
Patton continued playing polo and sailing in this time. After sailing back to Los Angeles for extended leave in 1937, he was kicked by a horse and fractured his leg. Patton developed phlebitis from the injury, which nearly killed him. The incident almost forced Patton out of active service, but a six-month administrative assignment in the Academic Department at the Cavalry School at Fort Riley helped him to recover. Patton was promoted to colonel on July 24, 1938 and given command of the 5th Cavalry at Fort Clark, Texas, for six months, a post he relished, but he was reassigned to Fort Myer again in December as commander of the 3rd Cavalry. There, he met Army Chief of Staff George C. Marshall, who was so impressed with him that Marshall considered Patton a prime candidate for promotion to general. In peacetime, though, he would remain a colonel to remain eligible to command a regiment.
Patton had a personal schooner named When and If. The schooner was designed by famous naval architect John G. Alden and built in 1939. The schooner's name comes from Patton saying he would sail it "when and if" he returned from war.

World War II

Following the German Army's invasion of Poland and the outbreak of World War II in Europe in September 1939, the U.S. military entered a period of mobilization, and Colonel Patton sought to build up the power of U.S. armored forces. During maneuvers the Third Army conducted in 1940, Patton served as an umpire, where he met Adna R. Chaffee Jr. and the two formulated recommendations to develop an armored force. Chaffee was named commander of this force, and created the 1st and 2nd Armored Divisions as well as the first combined arms doctrine. He named Patton commander of the 2nd Armored Brigade, part of the 2nd Armored Division. The division was one of few organized as a heavy formation with many tanks, and Patton was in charge of its training. Patton was promoted to brigadier general on October 2, made acting division commander in November, and on April 4, 1941 was promoted again to major general and made Commanding General (CG) of the 2nd Armored Division. As Chaffee stepped down from command of the I Armored Corps, Patton became the most prominent figure in U.S. armor doctrine. In December 1940, he staged a high-profile mass exercise in which 1,000 tanks and vehicles were driven from Columbus, Georgia, to Panama City, Florida, and back. He repeated the exercise with his entire division of 1,300 vehicles the next month. Patton earned a pilot's license and, during these maneuvers, observed the movements of his vehicles from the air to find ways to deploy them effectively in combat. His exploits earned him a spot on the cover of Life magazine.
General Patton led the division during the Tennessee Maneuvers in June 1941, and was lauded for his leadership, executing 48 hours' worth of planned objectives in only nine. During the September Louisiana Maneuvers, his division was part of the losing Red Army in Phase I, but in Phase II was assigned to the Blue Army. His division executed a 400-mile (640 km) end run around the Red Army and "captured" Shreveport, Louisiana. During the October–November Carolina Maneuvers, Patton's division captured Hugh Drum, commander of the opposing army. On January 15, 1942 he was given command of I Armored Corps, and the next month established the Desert Training Center in the Coachella Valley region of Riverside County in California, to run training exercises. He commenced these exercises in late 1941 and continued them into the summer of 1942. Patton chose a 10,000-acre (40 km2) expanse of desert area about 50 miles (80 km) southeast of Palm Springs. From his first days as a commander, Patton strongly emphasized the need for armored forces to stay in constant contact with opposing forces. His instinctive preference for offensive movement was typified by an answer Patton gave to war correspondents in a 1944 press conference. In response to a question on whether the Third Army's rapid offensive across France should be slowed to reduce the number of U.S. casualties, Patton replied, "Whenever you slow anything down, you waste human lives." It was around this time that a reporter, after hearing a speech where Patton said that it took "blood and brains" to win in combat, began calling him "blood and guts". The nickname would follow him for the rest of his life. Soldiers under his command were known at times to have quipped, "our blood, his guts". Nonetheless, he was known to be admired widely by the men under his charge.

North African Campaign

Under Lieutenant General Dwight D. Eisenhower, the Supreme Allied Commander, Patton was assigned to help plan the Allied invasion of French North Africa as part of Operation Torch in the summer of 1942. Patton commanded the Western Task Force, consisting of 33,000 men in 100 ships, in landings centered on Casablanca, Morocco. The landings, which took place on November 8, 1942, were opposed by Vichy French forces, but Patton's men quickly gained a beachhead and pushed through fierce resistance. Casablanca fell on November 11 and Patton negotiated an armistice with French General Charles Noguès. The Sultan of Morocco was so impressed that he presented Patton with the Order of Ouissam Alaouite, with the citation "Les Lions dans leurs tanières tremblent en le voyant approcher" (The lions in their dens tremble at his approach). Patton oversaw the conversion of Casablanca into a military port and hosted the Casablanca Conference in January 1943.
On March 6, 1943, following the defeat of the U.S. II Corps by the German Afrika Korps, commanded by Generalfeldmarschall Erwin Rommel, at the Battle of Kasserine Pass, Patton replaced Major General Lloyd Fredendall as Commanding General of the II Corps and was promoted to lieutenant general. Soon thereafter, he had Major General Omar Bradley reassigned to his corps as its deputy commander. With orders to take the battered and demoralized formation into action in 10 days' time, Patton immediately introduced sweeping changes, ordering all soldiers to wear clean, pressed and complete uniforms, establishing rigorous schedules, and requiring strict adherence to military protocol. He continuously moved throughout the command talking with men, seeking to shape them into effective soldiers. He pushed them hard, and sought to reward them well for their accomplishments. His uncompromising leadership style is evidenced by his orders for an attack on a hill position near Gafsa which are reported to have ended by him saying, "I expect to see such casualties among officers, particularly staff officers, as will convince me that a serious effort has been made to capture this objective."
Patton's training was effective, and on March 17, the U.S. 1st Infantry Division took Gafsa, winning the Battle of El Guettar, and pushing a German and Italian armored force back twice. In the meantime, on April 5, he removed Major General Orlando Ward, commanding the 1st Armored Division, after its lackluster performance at Maknassy against numerically inferior German forces. Advancing on Gabès, Patton's corps pressured the Mareth Line. During this time, he reported to British General Sir Harold Alexander, commander of the 18th Army Group, and came into conflict with Air Vice Marshal Sir Arthur Coningham about the lack of close air support being provided for his troops. When Coningham dispatched three officers to Patton's headquarters to persuade him that the British were providing ample air support, they came under German air attack mid-meeting, and part of the ceiling of Patton's office collapsed around them. Speaking later of the German pilots who had struck, Patton remarked, "if I could find the sons of bitches who flew those planes, I'd mail each of them a medal." By the time his force reached Gabès, the Germans had abandoned it. He then relinquished command of II Corps to Bradley, and returned to the I Armored Corps in Casablanca to help plan Operation Husky, the Allied invasion of Sicily. Fearing U.S. troops would be sidelined, he convinced British commanders to allow them to continue fighting through to the end of the Tunisia Campaign before leaving on this new assignment.

Sicily Campaign

For Operation Husky, the invasion of Sicily, Patton was to command the Seventh United States Army, dubbed the Western Task Force, in landings at Gela, Scoglitti and Licata to support landings by Bernard Montgomery's British Eighth Army. Patton's I Armored Corps was officially redesignated the Seventh Army just before his force of 90,000 landed before dawn on D-Day, July 10, 1943, on beaches near the town of Licata. The armada was hampered by wind and weather, but despite this the three U.S. infantry divisions involved, the 3rd, 1st, and 45th, secured their respective beaches. They then repulsed counterattacks at Gela, where Patton personally led his troops against German reinforcements from the Hermann Göring Division.
Initially ordered to protect the British forces' left flank, Patton was granted permission by Alexander to take Palermo after Montgomery's forces became bogged down on the road to Messina. As part of a provisional corps under Major General Geoffrey Keyes, the 3rd Infantry Division under Major General Lucian Truscott covered 100 miles (160 km) in 72 hours, arriving at Palermo on July 21. Patton then set his sights on Messina. He sought an amphibious assault, but it was delayed by lack of landing craft, and his troops did not land at Santo Stefano until August 8, by which time the Germans and Italians had already evacuated the bulk of their troops to mainland Italy. He ordered more landings on August 10 by the 3rd Infantry Division, which took heavy casualties but pushed the German forces back, and hastened the advance on Messina. A third landing was completed on August 16, and by 22:00 that day Messina fell to his forces. By the end of the battle, the 200,000-man Seventh Army had suffered 7,500 casualties, and killed or captured 113,000 Axis troops and destroyed 3,500 vehicles. Still, 40,000 German and 70,000 Italian troops escaped to Italy with 10,000 vehicles.
Patton's conduct in this campaign met with several controversies. He was also frequently in disagreement with Terry de la Mesa Allen Sr. and Theodore Roosevelt Jr. though often then conceding, to their relief, in line with Bradley's view.
When Alexander sent a transmission on July 19 limiting Patton's attack on Messina, his chief of staff, Brigadier General Hobart R. Gay, claimed the message was "lost in transmission" until Messina had fallen.
In an incident on July 22, while a U.S. armored column was under attack from German aircraft, he shot and killed a pair of mules that had stopped while pulling a cart across a bridge. The cart was blocking the way of the column. When their Sicilian owner protested, Patton attacked him with a walking stick and had his troops push the two mule carcasses off the bridge.
When informed of the Biscari massacre of prisoners, which was by troops under his command, Patton wrote in his diary, "I told Bradley that it was probably an exaggeration, but in any case to tell the officer to certify that the dead men were snipers or had attempted to escape or something, as it would make a stink in the press and also would make the civilians mad. Anyhow, they are dead, so nothing can be done about it." Bradley refused Patton's suggestions. Patton later changed his mind. After he learned that the 45th Division's Inspector General found "no provocation on the part of the prisoners ... They had been slaughtered" Patton is reported to have said: "Try the bastards.”

Slapping incidents and aftermath

Two high-profile incidents of Patton striking subordinates during the Sicily campaign attracted national controversy following the end of the campaign. On August 3, 1943, Patton slapped and verbally abused Private Charles H. Kuhl at an evacuation hospital in Nicosia after he had been found to suffer from "battle fatigue". On August 10, Patton slapped Private Paul G. Bennett under similar circumstances. Ordering both soldiers back to the front lines, Patton railed against cowardice and issued orders to his commanders to discipline any soldier making similar complaints.
Word of the incident reached Eisenhower, who privately reprimanded Patton and insisted he apologize. Patton apologized to both soldiers individually, as well as to doctors who witnessed the incidents, and later to all of the soldiers under his command in several speeches. Eisenhower suppressed the incident in the media, but in November journalist Drew Pearson revealed it on his radio program. Criticism of Patton in the United States was harsh, and included members of Congress and former generals, Pershing among them. The views of the general public remained mixed on the matter, and eventually Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson stated that Patton must be retained as a commander because of the need for his "aggressive, winning leadership in the bitter battles which are to come before final victory."
Patton did not command a force in combat for 11 months. In September, Bradley, who was Patton's junior in both rank and experience, was selected to command the First United States Army forming in England to prepare for Operation Overlord. This decision had been made before the slapping incidents were made public, but Patton blamed them for his being denied the command. Eisenhower felt the invasion of Europe was too important to risk any uncertainty, and that the slapping incidents had been an example of Patton's inability to exercise discipline and self-control. While Eisenhower and Marshall both considered Patton to be a skilled combat commander, they felt Bradley was less impulsive and less prone to making mistakes. On January 26, 1944, Patton was formally given command of the U.S. Third Army in England, a newly formed field Army, and he was assigned to prepare its inexperienced soldiers for combat in Europe. This duty kept Patton busy during the first half of 1944.

Phantom Army

The German High Command had more respect for Patton than for any other Allied commander and considered him to be central to any plan to invade Europe from England. Because of this, Patton was made a prominent figure in the deception operation, Fortitude, during the first half of 1944. Through the British network of double-agents, the Allies fed German intelligence a steady stream of false reports about troops sightings and that Patton had been named commander of the First United States Army Group (FUSAG), all designed to convince the Germans that Patton was preparing this massive command for an invasion at Pas de Calais. FUSAG was in reality an intricately constructed fictitious army of decoys, props, and fake radio signal traffic based around Dover to mislead German reconnaissance planes and to make Axis leaders believe that a large force was massing there. This helped to mask the real location of the invasion in Normandy. Patton was ordered to keep a low profile to deceive the Germans into thinking that he was in Dover throughout early 1944, when he was actually training the Third Army. As a result of Operation Fortitude, the German 15th Army remained at the Pas de Calais to defend against Patton's supposed attack. So strong was their conviction that this was the main landing area that the German army held its position there even after the invasion of Normandy on June 6, 1944. Patton flew to France a month later, and then returned to combat command.

Normandy breakout offensive

Sailing to Normandy throughout July, Patton's Third Army formed on the extreme right (west) of the Allied land forces, and became operational at noon on August 1, 1944, under Bradley's Twelfth United States Army Group. The Third Army simultaneously attacked west into Brittany, south, east toward the Seine, and north, assisting in trapping several hundred thousand German soldiers in the Falaise Pocket between Falaise and Argentan.
Patton's strategy with his army favored speed and aggressive offensive action, though his forces saw less opposition than did the other three Allied field armies in the initial weeks of its advance. The Third Army typically employed forward scout units to determine enemy strength and positions. Self-propelled artillery moved with the spearhead units and was sited well forward, ready to engage protected German positions with indirect fire. Light aircraft such as the Piper L-4 Cub served as artillery spotters and provided airborne reconnaissance. Once located, the armored infantry would attack using tanks as infantry support. Other armored units would then break through enemy lines and exploit any subsequent breach, constantly pressuring withdrawing German forces to prevent them from regrouping and reforming a cohesive defensive line. The U.S. armor advanced using reconnaissance by fire, and the .50 caliber M2 Browning heavy machine gun proved effective in this role, often flushing out and killing German panzerfaust teams waiting in ambush as well as breaking up German infantry assaults against the armored infantry.
The speed of the advance forced Patton's units to rely heavily on air reconnaissance and tactical air support. The Third Army had by far more military intelligence (G-2) officers at headquarters specifically designated to coordinate air strikes than any other army. Its attached close air support group was XIX Tactical Air Command, commanded by Brigadier General Otto P. Weyland. Developed originally by General Elwood Quesada of IX Tactical Air Command for the First Army in Operation Cobra, the technique of "armored column cover", in which close air support was directed by an air traffic controller in one of the attacking tanks, was used extensively by the Third Army. Each column was protected by a standing patrol of three to four P-47 and P-51 fighter-bombers as a combat air patrol (CAP).
In its advance from Avranches to Argentan, the Third Army traversed 60 miles (97 km) in just two weeks. Patton's force was supplemented by Ultra intelligence for which he was briefed daily by his G-2, Colonel Oscar Koch, who apprised him of German counterattacks, and where to concentrate his forces. Equally important to the advance of Third Army columns in northern France was the rapid advance of the supply echelons. Third Army logistics were overseen by Colonel Walter J. Muller, Patton's G-4, who emphasized flexibility, improvisation, and adaptation for Third Army supply echelons so forward units could rapidly exploit a breakthrough. Patton's rapid drive to Lorraine demonstrated his keen appreciation for the technological advantages of the U.S. Army. The major U.S. and Allied advantages were in mobility and air superiority. The U.S. Army had more trucks, more reliable tanks, and better radio communications, all of which contributed to a superior ability to operate at a rapid offensive pace.

Lorraine Campaign

Patton's offensive came to a halt on August 31, 1944, as the Third Army ran out of fuel near the Moselle River, just outside Metz. Patton expected that the theater commander would keep fuel and supplies flowing to support successful advances, but Eisenhower favored a "broad front" approach to the ground-war effort, believing that a single thrust would have to drop off flank protection, and would quickly lose its punch. Still within the constraints of a very large effort overall, Eisenhower gave Montgomery and his Twenty First Army Group a higher priority for supplies for Operation Market Garden. Combined with other demands on the limited resource pool, this resulted in the Third Army exhausting its fuel supplies. Patton believed his forces were close enough to the Siegfried Line that he remarked to Bradley that with 400,000 gallons of gasoline he could be in Germany within two days. In late September, a large German Panzer counterattack sent expressly to stop the advance of Patton's Third Army was defeated by the U.S. 4th Armored Division at the Battle of Arracourt. Despite the victory, the Third Army stayed in place as a result of Eisenhower's order. The German commanders believed this was because their counterattack had been successful.
The halt of the Third Army during the month of September was enough to allow the Germans to strengthen the fortress of Metz. In October and November, the Third Army was mired in a near-stalemate with the Germans during the Battle of Metz, both sides suffering heavy casualties. An attempt by Patton to seize Fort Driant just south of Metz was defeated, but by mid-November Metz had fallen to the Americans. Patton's decisions in taking this city were criticized. German commanders interviewed after the war noted he could have bypassed the city and moved north to Luxembourg where he would have been able to cut off the German Seventh Army. The German commander of Metz, General Hermann Balck, also noted that a more direct attack would have resulted in a more decisive Allied victory in the city. Historian Carlo D'Este later wrote that the Lorraine Campaign was one of Patton's least successful, faulting him for not deploying his divisions more aggressively and decisively.
With supplies low and priority given to Montgomery until the port of Antwerp could be opened, Patton remained frustrated at the lack of progress of his forces. From November 8 to December 15, his army advanced no more than 40 miles (64 km).

Battle of the Bulge

In December 1944, the German army, under the command of German Field Marshal Gerd von Rundstedt, launched a last-ditch offensive across Belgium, Luxembourg, and northeastern France. On December 16, 1944, it massed 29 divisions totaling 250,000 men at a weak point in the Allied lines, and during the early stages of the ensuing Battle of the Bulge, made significant headway towards the Meuse River during a severe winter. Eisenhower called a meeting of all senior Allied commanders on the Western Front at a headquarters near Verdun on the morning of December 19 to plan strategy and a response to the German assault.
At the time, Patton's Third Army was engaged in heavy fighting near Saarbrücken. Guessing the intent of the Allied command meeting, Patton ordered his staff to make three separate operational contingency orders to disengage elements of the Third Army from its present position and begin offensive operations toward several objectives in the area of the bulge occupied by German forces. At the Supreme Command conference, Eisenhower led the meeting, which was attended by Patton, Bradley, General Jacob Devers, Major General Kenneth Strong, Deputy Supreme Commander Air Chief Marshal Arthur Tedder, and several staff officers. When Eisenhower asked Patton how long it would take him to disengage six divisions of his Third Army and commence a counterattack north to relieve the U.S. 101st Airborne Division which had been trapped at Bastogne, Patton replied, "As soon as you're through with me." Patton then clarified that he had already worked up an operational order for a counterattack by three full divisions on December 21, then only 48 hours away. Eisenhower was incredulous: "Don't be fatuous, George. If you try to go that early you won't have all three divisions ready and you'll go piecemeal." Patton replied that his staff already had a contingency operations order ready to go. Still unconvinced, Eisenhower ordered Patton to attack the morning of December 22, using at least three divisions.
Patton left the conference room, phoned his command, and uttered two words: "Play ball." This code phrase initiated a prearranged operational order with Patton's staff, mobilizing three divisions—the 4th Armored Division, the U.S. 80th Infantry Division, and the U.S. 26th Infantry Division—from the Third Army and moving them north toward Bastogne. In all, Patton would reposition six full divisions, U.S. III Corps and U.S. XII Corps, from their positions on the Saar River front along a line stretching from Bastogne to Diekirch and to Echternach, the town in Luxembourg that had been at the southern end of the initial "Bulge" front line on December 16. Within a few days, more than 133,000 Third Army vehicles were rerouted into an offensive that covered an average distance of over 11 miles (18 km) per vehicle, followed by support echelons carrying 62,000 tonnes (61,000 long tons; 68,000 short tons) of supplies.
On December 21, Patton met with Bradley to review the impending advance, starting the meeting by remarking, "Brad, this time the Kraut's stuck his head in the meat grinder, and I've got hold of the handle." Patton then argued that his Third Army should attack toward Koblenz, cutting off the bulge at the base and trap the entirety of the German armies involved in the offensive. After briefly considering this, Bradley vetoed it, since he was less concerned about killing large numbers of Germans than he was in arranging for the relief of Bastogne before it was overrun. Desiring good weather for his advance, which would permit close ground support by U.S. Army Air Forces tactical aircraft, Patton ordered the Third Army chaplain, Colonel James Hugh O'Neill, to compose a suitable prayer. He responded with:
Almighty and most merciful Father, we humbly beseech Thee, of Thy great goodness, to restrain these immoderate rains with which we have had to contend. Grant us fair weather for Battle. Graciously hearken to us as soldiers who call upon Thee that, armed with Thy power, we may advance from victory to victory and crush the oppression and wickedness of our enemies, and establish Thy justice among men and nations. Amen.[131]
When the weather cleared soon after, Patton awarded O'Neill a Bronze Star Medal on the spot.
On December 26, 1944, the first spearhead units of the Third Army's 4th Armored Division reached Bastogne, opening a corridor for relief and resupply of the besieged forces. Patton's ability to disengage six divisions from front line combat during the middle of winter, then wheel north to relieve Bastogne was one of his most remarkable achievements during the war.[173] He later wrote that the relief of Bastogne was "the most brilliant operation we have thus far performed, and it is in my opinion the outstanding achievement of the war. This is my biggest battle.”

Advance into Germany

By February, the Germans were in full retreat. On February 23, 1945, the U.S. 94th Infantry Division crossed the Saar River and established a vital bridgehead at Serrig, through which Patton pushed units into the Saarland. Patton had insisted upon an immediate crossing of the Saar River against the advice of his officers. Historians such as Charles Whiting have criticized this strategy as unnecessarily aggressive.
Once again, Patton found other commands given priority on gasoline and supplies. To obtain these, Third Army ordnance units passed themselves off as First Army personnel and in one incident they secured thousands of gallons of gasoline from a First Army dump. Between January 29 and March 22, the Third Army took Trier, Coblenz, Bingen, Worms, Mainz, Kaiserslautern, and Ludwigshafen, killing or wounding 99,000 and capturing 140,112 German soldiers, which represented virtually all of the remnants of the German First and Seventh Armies. An example of Patton's sarcastic wit was broadcast when he received orders to bypass Trier, as it had been decided that four divisions would be needed to capture it. When the message arrived, Trier had already fallen. Patton rather caustically replied: "Have taken Trier with two divisions. Do you want me to give it back?"
The Third Army began crossing the Rhine River after constructing a pontoon bridge on March 22, two weeks after the First Army crossed it at Remagen, and Patton slipped a division across the river that evening. Patton later boasted he had urinated into the river as he crossed.
On March 26, 1945, Patton sent Task Force Baum, consisting of 314 men, 16 tanks, and assorted other vehicles, 50 miles (80 km) behind German lines to liberate the prisoner of war camp OFLAG XIII-B, near Hammelburg. Patton knew that one of the inmates was his son-in-law, Lieutenant Colonel John K. Waters. The raid was a failure, and only 35 men made it back; the rest were either killed or captured, and all 57 vehicles were lost. Patton reported this attempt to liberate Oflag XIII-B as the only mistake he made during World War II. When Eisenhower learned of the secret mission, he was furious. Patton later said he felt the correct decision would have been to send a Combat Command, which is a force about three times larger.
By April, resistance against the Third Army was tapering off, and the forces' main efforts turned to managing some 400,000 German prisoners of war. On April 14, 1945, Patton was promoted to general, a promotion long advocated by Stimson in recognition of Patton's battle accomplishments during 1944. Later that month, Patton, Bradley, and Eisenhower toured the Merkers salt mine as well as the Ohrdruf concentration camp, and seeing the conditions of the camp firsthand caused Patton great disgust. Third Army was ordered toward Bavaria and Czechoslovakia, anticipating a last stand by Nazi German forces there. He was reportedly appalled to learn that the Red Army would take Berlin, feeling that the Soviet Union was a threat to the U.S. Army's advance to Pilsen, but was stopped by Eisenhower from reaching Prague, Czechoslovakia, before V-E Day on May 8 and the end of the war in Europe.
In its advance from the Rhine to the Elbe, Patton's Third Army, which numbered between 250,000 and 300,000 men at any given time, captured 32,763 square miles (84,860 km2) of German territory. Its losses were 2,102 killed, 7,954 wounded, and 1,591 missing. German losses in the fighting against the Third Army totaled 20,100 killed, 47,700 wounded, and 653,140 captured.
Between becoming operational in Normandy on August 1, 1944, and the end of hostilities on May 9, 1945, the Third Army was in continuous combat for 281 days. In that time, it crossed 24 major rivers and captured 81,500 square miles (211,000 km2) of territory, including more than 12,000 cities and towns. The Third Army claimed to have killed, wounded, or captured 1,811,388 German soldiers, six times its strength in personnel. Fuller's review of Third Army records differs only in the number of enemy killed and wounded, stating that between August 1, 1944, and May 9, 1945, 47,500 of the enemy were killed, 115,700 wounded, and 1,280,688 captured, for a total of 1,443,888.

Postwar

Patton asked for a command in the Pacific Theater of Operations, begging Marshall to bring him to that war in any way possible. Marshall said he would be able to do so only if the Chinese secured a major port for his entry, an unlikely scenario. In mid-May, Patton flew to Paris, then London for rest. On June 7, he arrived in Bedford, Massachusetts, for extended leave with his family, and was greeted by thousands of spectators. Patton then drove to Hatch Memorial Shell and spoke to some 20,000, including a crowd of 400 wounded Third Army veterans. In this speech he aroused some controversy among the Gold Star Mothers when he stated that a man who dies in battle is "frequently a fool", adding that the wounded are heroes. Patton spent time in Boston before visiting and speaking in Denver and visiting Los Angeles, where he spoke to a crowd of 100,000 at the Memorial Coliseum. Patton made a final stop in Washington, D.C. before returning to Europe in July to serve in the occupation forces.[187]
On June 14, 1945, Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson decided that Patton would not be sent to the Pacific but would return to Europe in an occupation army assignment.
Patton was appointed as military governor of Bavaria, where he led the Third Army in denazification efforts. Patton was particularly upset when learning of the end of the war against Japan, writing in his diary, "Yet another war has come to an end, and with it my usefulness to the world." Unhappy with his position and depressed by his belief that he would never fight in another war, Patton's behavior and statements became increasingly erratic. Various explanations beyond his disappointments have been proposed for Patton's behavior at this point. Carlo D'Este wrote that "it seems virtually inevitable ... that Patton experienced some type of brain damage from too many head injuries" from a lifetime of numerous auto- and horse-related accidents, especially one suffered while playing polo in 1936.
Patton's niece Jean Gordon appeared again; they spent some time together in London in 1944, and again in Bavaria in 1945. Gordon actually loved a young married captain who left her despondent when he went home to his wife in September 1945. Patton repeatedly boasted of his sexual success with Gordon, but his biographers are skeptical. Hirshson said that the relationship was casual. Showalter believes that Patton, under severe physical and psychological stress, made up claims of sexual conquest to prove his virility. D'Este agrees, saying, "His behavior suggests that in both 1936 [in Hawaii] and 1944–45, the presence of the young and attractive Jean was a means of assuaging the anxieties of a middle-aged man troubled over his virility and a fear of aging."
Patton attracted controversy as military governor when it was noted that several former Nazi Party members continued to hold political posts in the region. When responding to the press about the subject, Patton repeatedly compared Nazis to Democrats and Republicans in noting that most of the people with experience in infrastructure management had been compelled to join the party in the war, causing negative press stateside and angering Eisenhower. On September 28, 1945, after a heated exchange with Eisenhower over his statements, Patton was relieved of his military governorship. He was relieved of command of the Third Army on October 7, and in a somber change of command ceremony, Patton concluded his farewell remarks, "All good things must come to an end. The best thing that has ever happened to me thus far is the honor and privilege of having commanded the Third Army."
Patton's final assignment was to command the U.S. 15th Army, based in Bad Nauheim. The 15th Army at this point consisted only of a small headquarters staff working to compile a history of the war in Europe. Patton had accepted the post because of his love of history, but quickly lost interest. He began traveling, visiting Paris, Rennes, Chartres, Brussels, Metz, Reims, Luxembourg, and Verdun. Then he went to Stockholm, where he reunited with other athletes from the 1912 Olympics. Patton decided that he would leave his post at the 15th Army and not return to Europe once he left on December 10 for Christmas leave. He intended to discuss with his wife whether he would continue in a stateside post or retire from the Army.

Accident and death

Patton's chief of staff, Major General Hobart Gay, invited him on a December 9 pheasant hunting trip near Speyer to lift his spirits. Observing derelict cars along the side of the road, Patton said, "How awful war is. Think of the waste." Moments later his car collided with an American army truck at low speed.
Gay and others were only slightly injured, but Patton hit his head on the glass partition in the back seat. He began bleeding from a gash to the head, and complained that he was paralyzed and having trouble breathing. Taken to a hospital in Heidelberg, Patton was discovered to have a compression fracture and dislocation of the cervical third and fourth vertebrae, resulting in a broken neck and cervical spinal cord injury that rendered him paralyzed from the neck down.
Patton spent most of the next 12 days in spinal traction to decrease the pressure on his spine. All non-medical visitors except for Patton's wife Beatrice, who had flown from the U.S., were forbidden. Patton, who had been told he had no chance to ever again ride a horse or resume normal life, at one point commented, "This is a hell of a way to die." He died in his sleep of pulmonary edema and congestive heart failure at about 6:00 pm on 21 December 1945.
On 24 December Patton was buried at the Luxembourg American Cemetery and Memorial in the Hamm district of Luxembourg City, alongside some wartime casualties of the Third Army, in accordance with his request to, "be buried with [his] men." Following the service Mrs. Beatrice Patton was immediately flown to Paris where she boarded a C-54 Transport to be flown home.

(Web, Google, Wikipedia, You Tube)






























 

sabato 30 gennaio 2021

Il Mikoyan MiG-41 in fase di sviluppo dalla Mikoian, nell'ambito del programma PAK DP (ПАК ДП, abbreviazione di: Перспективный авиационный комплекс дальнего перехвата)


La società statale russa Mikoyan (MiG) lavora da tempo ad un nuovo velivolo da Mach 5, il vero sostituto del Mig-25 Foxbat e del successivo Mig-31 Foxhoond.


Il MiG-31 (Микояна и Гуревича МиГ-31 in caratteri cirillici, in codifica NATO "Foxhound", una razza canina utilizzata per la caccia alla volpe) è un caccia intercettore ognitempo supersonico sovietico-russo realizzato per rimpiazzare il MiG-25 "Foxbat", progettato esplicitamente per contrastare i bombardieri strategici e missili da crociera.


Il MiG-31 venne costruito a Nižnij Novgorod (allora chiamata "Gorkij") e nacque in risposta ad una specifica del comando dell'allora difesa aerea sovietica per un intercettore ad elevate prestazioni, che offrisse maggiore flessibilità di impiego ed autonomia dalle stazioni di guida-caccia. Lo scopo era realizzare un aereo in grado di difendere lo spazio aereo dell'Unione Sovietica dalla minaccia rappresentata dai missili da crociera, sia trasportati da aerei (come il Boeing B-52), sia lanciati da sistemi terrestri o navali (in particolare i BGM-109 Tomahawk). Inoltre, il suo compito è anche quello di intercettare i bombardieri supersonici, come ad esempio i Panavia Tornado ed i B-1.
Il punto di partenza fu il MiG-25 "Foxbat", un aereo che già aveva delle prestazioni simili a quelle richieste. Da questa base, i tecnici dell'ufficio MiG realizzarono un intercettore biposto, caratterizzato da numerose innovazioni rispetto al predecessore, in particolare motori più potenti, maggiore autonomia, una cellula rinforzata per consentire velocità supersoniche a basse quote, ed un sistema d'arma più potente.


I motori previsti per il MiG-31 erano i Tumansky R-15BF-2-300 da 13.500 kgf con postbruciatore, ma visto che questi non erano stati messi a punto, furono sostituiti con i Soloviev D-30F-6 da 9.500 kg a secco e 15.500 kgf con postbruciatore. Questi motori vennero montati sul prototipo, designato MiG-25MP (poi Ye-155MP), che volò per la prima volta il 16 settembre del 1975.
Tuttavia lo sviluppo andò avanti con estrema lentezza, tanto che l'aereo entrò in servizio solo nel 1982. La versione definitiva ebbe la designazione interna di I-01, e venne prodotta in serie presso gli stabilimenti aeronautici di Nižnij Novgorod (che allora si chiamava Gorkij).
In occidente si venne a conoscenza del progetto grazie alle informazioni del tenente pilota Viktor Belenko, che disertò nel 1976. La prima foto (escluse le immagini satellitari) è del 1985, realizzata da un pilota norvegese.
La produzione totale, andata avanti a rilento dopo il 1991 e completamente cessata nel 1997, ammonta a circa 500 unità.
Il MiG-31 non è mai stato oggetto di esportazioni al di fuori dell'Unione Sovietica. Inoltre, anche dopo lo scioglimento della stessa, il suo utilizzo continua ad essere limitato a Paesi appartenenti alla CSI: la voce di un contratto del 1992 con la Repubblica Popolare Cinese (24 esemplari acquistati, più la licenza di produzione per altri 700) non è mai stata confermata, e le trattative con l'Iran per 24 esemplari non hanno avuto seguito.
Ad oggi, le uniche nazioni che utilizzano il velivolo nelle proprie forze aeree sono Russia e Kazakistan.
La Russia è il principale utente di questo aereo. Infatti, risultano operativi 286 esemplari (256 nell'aviazione e 30 nella marina), aggiornati allo standard MiG-31B e MiG-31BS.
Il Kazakistan ne ha ricevuti 32 esemplari in seguito alla disgregazione dell'Unione Sovietica. Nonostante questi potenti e sofisticati aerei siano probabilmente eccessivi rispetto alle esigenze della V-VS(QR), risultano ancora in servizio.
Dal punto di vista operativo, il MiG-31 è sicuramente più capace e versatile del suo predecessore. Si tratta infatti di un aereo in grado di effettuare missioni di intercettazione praticamente con qualunque situazione meteo, capace di ingaggiare avversari che vanno dal bombardiere strategico al missile da crociera. Tuttavia, non si tratta di un aereo adatto al combattimento manovrato a causa delle sue dimensioni e del suo peso.
Oggi vengono usati (soprattutto in Russia settentrionale) anche con il ruolo di aerei AWACS. Questo è possibile grazie al sofisticato sistema di data-link, che rende possibile collegare tra loro 4 MiG-31, permettendogli in questo modo di controllare un fronte di ben 900 km.
Ne sono stati prodotti circa 500, mai impiegati in operazioni belliche.
Questo aereo, derivato dal MiG-25, non ha praticamente nulla in comune col suo predecessore. Il disegno è diverso per tutta una serie di particolari.
Per la costruzione sono stati utilizzati titanio (16%), lega di alluminio (33%), acciaio al nichel saldato ad arco (49%) e materiali compositi (2%). Questa particolare composizione aumenta la resistenza della struttura, e permette all'aereo di raggiungere velocità supersoniche anche a bassa quota (Mach 1,23, pari a 1.500 km/h). Ad alta quota può raggiungere Mach 2,83 (3494 km/h), ma la velocità massima teoricamente raggiungibile sarebbe di Mach 3 (raggiungerla potrebbe però comportare rischi per la struttura del velivolo).
La capacità di combustibile interna è di oltre 20.000 litri, ed è caratterizzato dalla possibilità di imbarcare due serbatoi supplementari sotto le ali da 2.500 litri l'uno. La versione base è sprovvista della possibilità di rifornimento in volo.

Armamento

La dotazione tipica di missione del MiG-31 consiste in quattro missili aria-aria Vympel R-33 (nome in codice NATO: AA-9 Amos), che hanno una gittata di 110–120 km, e quattro Molniya R-60 (AA-8 Aphid), con una gittata di 7–12 km. Inoltre, è equipaggiato con un cannone a sei canne rotanti interno GSh-6-23 da 23 mm (con 260 colpi), che ha una cadenza di fuoco dichiarata tra i 6.000 e gli 8.000 colpi al minuto. Il punto di forza del suo armamento è sicuramente il radar, un NIIP SBI-16 Zaslon (nome in codice NATO: "Flash Dance") munito di un'antenna a scansione elettronica, con una portata di oltre 200 km in scoperta e 120 in inseguimento. Pare si tratti del più potente radar d'attacco esistente: ha la capacità di inseguire 10 bersagli ed ingaggiarne fino a 4 contemporaneamente, a quote di volo che vanno da 25 a 28.000 metri. Tuttavia, pare che le versioni successive montino una versione del radar migliorata, lo Zaslon-M, che sembra abbia una portata di 400 km.

Versioni:
  • MiG-31 “Foxhound-A" - Versione base, entrato in servizio nel 1982. Può portare 8 missili ed è fornito di un data-link che consente a 4 aerei di pattugliare un fronte di 900 km. Fornito di un sistema radar APD-518 per attacchi silenziosi, è in grado di ingaggiare fino a 4 bersagli contemporaneamente.
  • MiG-31LL - Uno dei primi modelli di MiG-31 convertito in aereo sperimentale con agganci per macchine fotografiche sulle ali.
  • MiG-31DZ “Foxhound-A" - Designazione non ufficiale dei MiG-31 modificati con sonda per il rifornimento in volo davanti all'abitacolo.
  • MiG-31B "Foxhound-A" (Izdelye 02) - Introdotto nel 1990. Versione migliorata del MiG-31. Prodotto in serie.
  • MiG-31BS “Foxhound-A" - Versione con radar migliorato, contiene alcuni elementi del MiG-31M (stesso armamento e possibilità di portare quattro serbatoi subalari da 2.250 litri).
  • MiG-31E - Versione da esportazione rimasta senza seguito. Un esemplare costruito.
  • MiG-31M "Foxhound-B" (Izdelye 05) - 7 prototipi costruiti. Può ingaggiare in contemporanea 6 bersagli. Non prodotto in serie a causa del crollo dell'URSS. Lo sviluppo è iniziato nel 1983 ed il primo volo è del 1986. Si tratta di un aereo più sofisticato, ha una sonda per il rifornimento in volo completamente retrattile, un nuovo sistema di comandi ed un radar MIIP S-800 Zaslon-M, con funzioni più sofisticate. Il radar, infatti, può inseguire fino a 10 bersagli contemporaneamente ed ingaggiarne 4. L'armamento previsto è 4 Vympel R-37 (AA-X-13) e 4 Vympel R-77 (AA-12 Adder). È stato costruito in 7 esemplari, ma non ha avuto seguito. Per il cannone, sul MiG-31M la cadenza di colpi è di 12.000 colpi/min teorici.
  • MiG-31D (Izdelye 07) - 2 esemplari modificati e sperimentati tra il 1986 ed il 1987. Possono imbarcare un missile con capacità antisatellite. Il programma è stato sospeso con la cancellazione del programma americano SDI (il Strategic Defense Initiative).
  • MiG-31BM - Versione multiruolo. I test per l'aggiornamento sono stati completati nel 1999. Si tratta di un caccia multiruolo che è in grado di colpire anche bersagli al suolo. L'aggiornamento principale consiste in un computer di bordo e in un radar in grado di attivare contemporaneamente sia i missili aria-aria sia quelli aria-superficie. In operazioni di intercettazione può ingaggiare fino a 24 bersagli contemporaneamente.
  • MiG-31FE “Foxhound-B" - Versione multiruolo d'esportazione del MiG-31BM.
  • MiG-31A (MiG-31S) - Versione MiG-31D modificata per il lancio di un satellite.

Incidenti: Un MiG-31 è precipitato il 6 settembre 2011 sugli Urali ed entrambi i membri dell'equipaggio sono morti; in attesa dell'esito dell'inchiesta l'intera flotta di MiG-31 è stata messa a terra.

Utilizzatori:
  • Kazakistan - Sil Vozdushnoy Oborony Respubliki Kazakhstan - 32 MiG-31 ex sovietici ricevuti a partire dal 1997. Uno dei 21 esemplari in servizio al dicembre 2019 è stato perso ad aprile 2020.
  • Russia - Voenno-vozdušnye sily Rossijskoj Federacii - ~120 esemplari in servizio al 2016. Inizialmente dovevano essere 110 gli aerei aggiornati alla versione MiG-31BM, ma a giugno 2020 è stato reso noto che l'aggiornamento sarà esteso a 130 esemplari. - Aviacija Voenno-Morskogo Flota.
La Russia ha cercato a lungo la sostituzione della vecchia flotta di caccia MiG-31 per sviluppare un nuovo intercettore a lungo raggio, che cercherà di basarsi sul concetto centrale del MiG-31. La flotta di caccia MiG-31 del Paese dovrebbe ritirarsi entro il 2028.


Alcuni rapporti russi avevano anche affermato che il nuovo PAK-DP potrebbe essere sviluppato in un combattente senza pilota in futuro. Il capo della fabbrica MiG durante una mostra sulla difesa nel 2017 ha affermato che si tratterà di un aereo completamente nuovo, "dove verranno applicate tecnologie completamente nuove per lavorare nella sfera artica".
Ha detto che il PAK-DP custodirà "l'intero confine della nostra patria, poi sarà trasferito al progetto senza pilota".
Se si deve credere a un quotidiano russo Izvestia, il MiG-41 diventerà un intercettore di missili ipersonici trasportando un sistema missilistico intercettore a lungo raggio multifunzionale (MPKR DP) che erogherà diversi sottomissili per aumentare le possibilità di intercettazione armi ipersoniche.
Il documento prosegue spiegando il concetto: “dopo che un proiettile ipersonico è stato rilevato dai radar di terra o dalla rete di allerta precoce della Russia, il MiG-41 lancerà il missile intercettore a lungo raggio. Quel missile si dividerà in sottomissili più piccoli, che poi attaccheranno il proiettile "frontalmente".


Il capo della Russian Aircraft Corporation Ilya Tarasenko una volta aveva affermato che il nuovo MiG-41 sarebbe stato dotato di un laser antimissile e sarebbe stato in grado di operare ad altitudini molto elevate e anche nello spazio vicino. Ha anche indicato a un punto vendita russo RIA Novosti che il PAK DP può operare nello spazio.
"Il PAK DP, o MiG-41, avrà "la capacità di operare nello spazio, nuove armi, nuove velocità, nuovo raggio operativo", ha detto Tarasenko al canale televisivo Zvezda.
Il predecessore del caccia, il MiG-31, ha la reputazione di essere un caccia-intercettore supersonico a lungo raggio, progettato per l'uso contro bersagli aerei sia ad alta che a bassa quota, introdotto nell'esercito sovietico già nel 1980. Il MiG-41, quando sarà pronto, rimarrà il principale intercettore della Russia fino agli anni '30.
Secondo il comandante dell'aeronautica militare russa, l'introduzione dell'aereo in servizio è prevista per il 2025.
Per essere un formidabile intercettore, il PAK-DP dovrà avere un'altissima velocità e la capacità di volare ad altitudini estremamente elevate per poter neutralizzare bersagli ultraveloci ad altitudini elevate. Ciò richiederà anche nuove armi e sistemi radar di bordo aggiornati.
Non si sa molto delle armi che il MiG-41 trasporterà, anche se il capo delle forze aerospaziali russe ha detto ai media quest'anno che il caccia trasporterà missili aria-aria a lungo raggio R-37, "così come completamente nuovi missili.
L'agenzia di stampa russa Izvestia aveva anche riferito che il MiG-41 trasporterà un "sistema missilistico intercettore multifunzionale a lungo raggio in grado di colpire missili ipersonici" con testate multiple.
I resoconti dei media hanno indicato che il design del caccia era già stato finalizzato entro la fine del 2019 e Tarasenko aveva detto ai giornalisti che lo sviluppo era in corso a giugno di quest'anno. Tuttavia, ci sono notevoli dubbi su tutte le affermazioni fatte su quali nuove tecnologie MiG-41 sarà armato.


I media ritengono che lo sviluppo di una versione senza pilota del PAK DP da parte della Russia è improbabile in tale situazione, considerando che richiede un impegno tecnico significativo e risorse considerevoli, carenti nella Russia di oggi.
La mancanza di notizie fresche sullo sviluppo del programma del nuovo intercettore strategico potrebbe indicare ritardi o difficoltà tecniche nel progetto. I piloti e le case produttrici di aerei hanno rilasciato pochissime dichiarazioni sulle capacità di questo progetto. Se tutto andrà secondo i piani, la Russia avrà l'intercettore più avanzato e il caccia più sofisticato al mondo entro il 2030 (forse)!
Per difendere gli estesi confini russi è necessario un caccia-intercettore di nuova generazione, stealth, velocità ipersonica e pilotaggio remoto. E se non fosse necessario e bastassero i mezzi a disposizione? Proprio di recente una nota rivista del settore ha riportato che la Russia sta continuando a lavorare al nuovo MiG-41, conosciuto anche come PAK DP, un caccia-intercettore.
Il nuovo bombardiere stealth è denominato il PAK DA. 


Le notizie su questo velivolo che chiamano MiG-41 sono poche. 
Nel 2018 il direttore generale di una società russa, ha ribadito l’avvenuto inizio dei lavori per la messa a punto del PAK DP e il Ministero russo della Difesa avrebbe selezionato i progetti più interessanti di MiG e Sukhoi: i lavori in tale direzione continuano.
Negli anni 2000 in Russia fu avviata la realizzazione di alcuni progetti consistenti nell’elaborazione di nuove tecnologie aeronautiche accomunate dal principio del PAK, un acronimo russo che significa Futuro Sistema Aereo. Il più noto dei velivoli di questa categoria è il PAK FA, ossia l’aeromobile di prima linea che tutti conosciamo come Su-57 Felon.
Oltre al PAK FA, furono avviati i lavori anche su altri progetti strategici come il PAK DA (bombardiere-vettore strategico pesante a lungo raggio), il PAK TA (aeromobile dedicato al trasporto che sostituirà l’An-124 Ruslan), il PAK DP (risposta russa allo statunitense SR-72 Aurora, ossia un caccia-intercettore di lungo raggio che entro la fine degli anni 2020 sostituirà il MiG-31).
La situazione geo-strategica della Russia interagisce in maniera importante sui caccia-intercettori a lunga autonomia. Le enormi distese disabitate dell’estremo Nord, prive di sistemi di difesa contraerea, consentirebbero ai bombardieri intercontinentali ostili di penetrare senza sforzo nelle aree centrali del Paese. La dislocazione a Nord di una rete di radar ha risolto la questione del rilevamento di eventuali attacchi aerei e per contrastare questi ultimi sono state vagliate due possibilità:
  • L’installazione di un gran numero di sistemi di difesa contraerea (tuttavia, con uno svantaggio, ossia il loro raggio d’azione limitato);
  • La creazione di un velivolo-intercettore con una significativa autonomia di volo in grado di rimanere per lungo tempo nell’area di combattimento e, in caso di rilevamento di bombardieri nemici, di intercettarli e distruggerli.

Verso la fine degli anni ’50 in Unione sovietica nacque il progetto del caccia pesante a lunga autonomia, il Tu-128 il quale presentava una autonomia di volo superiore ai 2500 km ed in grado di trasportare missili aria-aria a lunga portata. Negli anni ’80 il Tu-128 nelle aree più a nord del Paese venne gradualmente sostituito dal MiG-31, l’intercettore strategico più avanzato a quei tempi.
Questo aeromobile era di per sé unico in quanto presentava: 
  • una velocità superiore ai 3.000 km/h, 
  • una significativa autonomia di volo, 
  • la possibilità di svolgere combattimenti aerei con qualsivoglia aeromobile contemporaneo, 
  • la funzione di “radar volante” e un centro di controllo in grado di direzionare altri aeromobili in direzione di obiettivi aerei del nemico. 
Quattro MiG-31 erano in grado mediante il proprio radar di controllare fino a 1.000 km di fronte aereo. Questo aeromobile, con la nuova versione MiG-31BM, garantisce a questi velivoli di rimanere all’avanguardia ancora per lungo tempo. Tuttavia, il problema è che il MiG-31 non è mai stato dotato di tecnologie stealth, e avrà maggiori difficoltà a contrastare velivoli di quinta generazione.  Il PAK-DP, concepito per sostituire il MiG-31, dovrà non solo prendere in prestito da quest’ultimo tutte le funzionalità di alta qualità risalenti al passato, ma anche dotarsi di alcune nuove caratteristiche: di fatto dovrà essere un caccia di sesta generazione e dovrà necessariamente essere impiegato sia nella versione pilotata sia in quella senza pilota. 
Tramite l’intelligenza artificiale del nuovo velivolo sarà possibile impiegare quest’ultimo mediante controllo remoto da terra o da un altro velivolo, nonché si avrà la possibilità di effettuare operazioni autonome senza pilota. Chiaramente questo semplificherà in maniera significativa la guida del velivolo al pilota che potrà prestare maggiore attenzione al controllo dei sistemi di armamento e della panoramica della situazione aerea circostante. A tal proposito è probabile che, a fronte di tali funzionalità, il MiG-41, a differenza del MiG-31 e del Tu-128, diventi un velivolo monoposto. I precedenti intercettori strategici, invece, erano sempre guidati da due piloti.


La quota di volo presunta del PAK DP dovrà essere superiore ai 30 km, mentre la velocità si sarà di oltre Mach 4+. Al momento a questa velocità volano soltanto i missili balistici ed ipersonici. Il raggiungimento di simili velocità è impossibile senza l’adozione di nuovi motori e senza una particolare conformazione dell’aeromobile che dovrà ridurre al minimo la resistenza aerodinamico con l’uso anche di materiali in grado di contenere il surriscaldamento termico generato a velocità così elevate.
I velivoli come il MiG-25, il MiG-31 o lo statunitense SR-71 Blackbird, di norma, erano caratterizzati non solo da una forma inusuale, ma erano anche dotati di apposite leghe di acciaio e titanio termo-resistenti. L’acciaio rimarrà certamente presente nel futuro Mig-41, ma la maggior parte della struttura dovrà essere realizzata con nuovi materiali compositi e “metamateriali”.


Il MiG-41, analogamente al MiG-31, dovrà trasportare missili per l’intercettazione a lungo raggio che garantiscano la distruzione di obiettivi aerei a distanze oltre i 300 km. Questo aeromobile dovrà essere una piattaforma versatile per l’intercettazione non solo di obiettivi aerei classici, ma anche di obiettivi ipersonici e spaziali. Non è da escludere nemmeno l’eventualità di una versione d’assalto di questo velivolo equipaggiata con missili aria-superficie.
Stando alle dichiarazioni rese dai dirigenti aerospaziali russi, i lavori in corso sul progetto non saranno terminati prima del 2025. Subito dopo si darà probabilmente avvio alle forniture del nuovo aeromobile a favore delle forze aeronautico-spaziali della Federazione Russa, a condizione che tutti i problemi tecnici incontrati nel progetto saranno risolti con successo. Oltre alle sfide di natura prettamente tecnica che dovranno essere superate dai progettisti, si presenta un ulteriore problema: al momento non è ancora totalmente chiaro se all’aeronautica russa serva o meno un mezzo così unico e costoso.
Nell’aviazione militare a livello globale si registra, in linea di massima, la tendenza a rendere più versatili possibile gli aeromobili. E prima o poi tutti gli sviluppatori del comparto giungono a questa conclusione perché con l’avanzare delle generazioni la creazione di un nuovo velivolo costa sempre di più. Lo si vede già con lo statunitense F-35 e con il russo Su-57: entrambi riescono ad effettuare con successo missioni d’assalto e a svolgere combattimenti aerei. Il PAK DP, invece, non sarà un mezzo versatile. Si imporrà piuttosto come un “principe” elitario.
Inoltre, molte delle lacune a livello di difesa aerea d’area possono essere colmate da sistemi contraerei meno costosi e già operativi. Ma se sarà dato il via libera al progetto del PAK DP, è probabile che nel prossimo decennio saremo testimoni di un nuovo salto di qualità nello sviluppo dell’aviazione.
Allo stato attuale, l’azienda russa Rostec ha finalizzato la fase di design e ha avviato la successiva fase di ricerca e sviluppo relativa al progetto riguardante il nuovo intercettore a lungo raggio che sostituirà gli attuali MiG-31 FOXHOUND. Il progetto, ufficialmente denominato MiG-41/PAK-DP (acronimo che sta per “futuro sistema aereo per intercettazione a lungo raggio”), prevede lo sviluppo di un velivolo di “nuova generazione”. Per quanto le sue caratteristiche non siano state ancora ufficializzate, come già sopra evidenziato, è verosimile ritenere che si tratterà di un aereo stealth a pilotaggio convenzionale (forse remotizzabile), quasi certamente bimotore (probabilmente con propulsione di tipo scramjet), in grado di raggiungere velocità prossime all’ipersonico. Analogamente al MiG-31 - e al suo predecessore MiG-25 – il MiG-41 dovrà fungere da piattaforma di lancio dei missili aria-aria a lungo raggio R-37/R-37M contro minacce aeree classiche, quali bombardieri tattici/strategici e ricognitori. A differenza dei FOXHOUND e dei FOXBAT, tuttavia, il velivolo dovrà essere impiegato anche contro minacce ipersoniche (aerei e missili) e spaziali (satelliti). Il MiG-41 potrà essere armato con il nuovo missile aria-aria MPKR-DP, anch’esso in via di sviluppo e accreditato di una gittata minima di 300 km, munito di una testata multipla con sub-munizioni separabili dal corpo del missile principale al fine di incrementarne le capacità di impatto proprio contro bersagli ipersonici. Come già detto, non è da escludere che il Mig-41 possa essere ottimizzato con secondarie capacità aria-suolo e con armamento ad energia diretta (laser). Sulla carta, sarà un aereo di 6ª generazione, le cui capacità andrebbero ad integrare quelle del Su-57 FELON, velivolo con una vocazione maggiormente multiruolo rispetto a quello che dovrebbe rappresentare un intercettore puro.

Il Mikoyan MiG-41 è un russo Stealth aereo intercettore/caccia pesante fase di sviluppo da Mikoian, nell'ambito del programma PAK DP (russo: ПАК ДП, abbreviazione di: Перспективный авиационный комплекс дальнего перехвата, romanizzato:  Perspektivny aviatsionny Kompleks dal'nego perekhvata, illuminato'' complessa aria prospettico a lungo raggio intercettazione''), che si propone di sostituire il Mikoyan MiG-31 nel Air force russa a metà degli anni 2020. Secondo l'analista della difesa russo Vasily Kashin, il MiG-41 sarebbe considerato un progetto di 5++ o 6a generazione.
Il lavoro sull'intercettore supersonico PAK DP MiG-41 sta facendo uso dei progetti MiG-701 (Izdeliye 7.01), Mikoyan MiG-301 e Mikoyan MiG-321 iniziati negli anni '90.
A luglio 2016, non erano disponibili molte informazioni a parte l'affermazione che tale velivolo è previsto per lo sviluppo, non erano disponibili dati ufficiali sulle sue capacità. È stato ipotizzato che potrebbe entrare in servizio entro la metà degli anni 2020 o 2030. In qualità di intercettore, si diceva che la sua missione principale fosse quella di compensare i futuri aerei da ricognizione attualmente in fase di sviluppo da parte degli Stati Uniti d'America e della Cina. Per raggiungere le alte velocità che si vocifera per l'aereo, l'aereo dovrebbe essere equipaggiato con motori ramjet o turboramjet.
Il design del MiG-41 è stato finalizzato entro la fine del 2019, contemporaneamente al completamento del lavoro di ricerca. Nel 2020, all'interno di quel quadro di ricerca, il Ministero della Difesa russo ha selezionato il progetto più promettente. Il lavoro in questo settore ora continua nella ricerca e sviluppo. Ilya Tarasenko, il direttore generale della MiG corporation, nonché il capo della società Sukhoi, ha dichiarato in un'intervista nel luglio 2020 che il PAK DP sarà progettato sulla base del design del Mig-31.
Secondo la Izvestia, il MiG-41 dovrebbe diventare un intercettore di missili ipersonici trasportando un sistema missilistico intercettore a lungo raggio multifunzionale (MPKR DP) che erogherà diversi sottomissili per aumentare le possibilità di intercettare armi ipersoniche.  Il PAK DP è destinato anche a trasportare missili anti-satellite. 
Nel gennaio 2021, Rostec Corporation, proprietaria di Mikoyan, annunciò che il MiG-41 era ormai entrato nella fase di sviluppo, affermando che "lo sviluppo della prossima generazione di caccia intercettatori è già iniziato. Il progetto del PAK DP con la denominazione 'MiG -41 'è in fase di sviluppo dei lavori ". 
In un'intervista per Russia Today, il direttore generale di RSK MiG, Ilya Tarasenko, ha affermato che sarebbe stata una nuova costruzione in grado di Mach numero 4-4.3, dotata di un laser anti-missile, e ha detto che sarebbe in grado di operare a molto ad altitudini elevate e anche nello spazio vicino . Ha anche affermato che potrebbe essere trasformato in una versione senza pilota in seguito. Se acquistato dall'aeronautica militare russa , ha detto che il primo MiG-41 di produzione sarebbe stato completato nel 2025.
L'aereo probabilmente navigherà a velocità di almeno Mach 3 (3.675 km/h; 2.284 mph) e volerà ad altitudini elevate (a livelli tra la stratopausa e la tropopausa, cioè sotto i 45.000 metri e sopra i 12.000 metri) per coprire la maggior parte del vasto territorio della Russia nel più breve periodo di tempo. Potrebbe utilizzare i motori Izdeliye 30 attualmente in fase di sviluppo per il Su-57.  Il MiG-41 utilizzerà la tecnologia stealth. 
Secondo Avia Pro, il MiG-41 sarà costruito sulla base del caccia Su-57, con una diversa configurazione e una cellula modificata in modo da poter raggiungere una velocità massima di oltre 6.100 km/h (Mach 4.9) e una velocità di crociera di 2.500-3.000 km/h (Mach 2-2,4). Gli esperti non escludono che il design del MiG-41 sarà simile allo stesso tempo all'aspetto del Su-57 e del MiG-31.  È allo studio anche una versione senza pilota. 
MiG Aircraft Corporation sta lavorando al MiG-41, un futuro progetto di caccia intercettore di quinta generazione; a riferirlo all’agenzia TASS è stato l’AD della società russa MiG Ilya Tarasenko. “No, questo non è un progetto mitico – ha dichiarato Tarasenko – anzi, si tratta di un progetto di vecchia data per il nostro bureau ma solo adesso stiamo portando avanti seriamente questo lavoro sotto l’egida della UAC e prossimamente verrà presentato al pubblico.”
In effetti la sostituzione futura dell’intercettore MiG-31 era programmata da diversi anni e il progetto del PAK-DP (Predpolagayemyy vozdukha Kompleks dlya Dal’ney Perekhvat, in italiano Futuro sistema aereo di intercettazione a lungo raggio, proseguendo la similitudine delle sigle con i nuovi progetti PAK-FA, PAK-DA e PAK-TA, rispettivamente caccia, bombardiere e aereo da trasporto russi di futura concezione) avrà la sua ragion d’essere nella realizzazione del nuovo MiG-41 che dovrebbe essere dotato di nuovi missili aria-aria a lungo raggio e di una nuova categoria di armi laser, dovrebbe avere capacità di impiego spaziali (inteso a quote comprese tra lo stratopausa e la tropopausa, ovvero al di sotto dei 45.000 metri di quota e superiore ai 12.000 metri), invisibilità radar, autonomia notevolmente accresciuta e una velocità massima elevatissima compresa tra Mach 4 e 4.3, tanto che al fine di supportare il pilota nelle sue operazioni potrebbe essere necessario adottare non meglio precisati elementi di intelligenza artificiali incorporati in alcune avioniche del MiG-41 e inoltre, stante alle dichiarazioni rese da Tarasenko alla fine dello scorso anno, tecnologie completamente nuove per operare nella zona artica per proteggere i confini nazionali in qualsiasi latitudine.
Tra i tanti progetti sopra elencati, siamo certi insomma che il PAK-DP/MiG-41 rivesta un’importanza fondamentale strategica per le Forze Armate russe tanto da poter scommettere sulla sua realizzazione anche se non in tempi brevissimi (ricordiamo infatti che l’ultimo aggiornamento dei MiG-31, denominato BM, dovrebbe consentire loro di arrivare ad operare fino al 2025-2030).
I motivi dell’inderogabilità del progetto sono numerosi: in primis, la Russia ha un’estensione territoriale continentale così ampia che un progetto tale non può di certo concludersi con la fine operativa dei MiG-31, la loro sostituzione potrebbe certamente essere rimandata da eventuali ulteriori aggiornamenti del “Foxhound”, ma anche per quest’ultimo giungerà la parola fine e il MiG-41 dovrà essere necessariamente realizzato senza se e senza ma.
Il MiG-41 potrebbe sfruttare la natura multiruolo delle precedenti macchine MiG-25 e MiG-31 (quest’ultimo ad esempio con la recente versione K idoneo al lancio del missile da crociera aria-terra Kinžal) ampliando così il ventaglio di operazioni di attacco stand-off della VKS con una macchina di quinta generazione dotata di velocità supersonica.
Un’altra valida ragione è che la Russia desidera mantenere viva l’eredità del bureau MiG all’interno della United Aircraft Corporation (UAC). Dal momento che Sukhoi svolge il ruolo unico e principale nel progetto PAK FA (Su-57), MiG ha bisogno di un progetto di nuova generazione su cui lavorare. Il MiG-35, pur essendo avanzato, non appartiene ancora alla famiglia dei progetti futuri di nuova generazione e il PAK-DP è la giusta direzione da intraprendere per la società MiG, forte dell’esperienza ottenuta in passato con i MiG-25/31.
Un’ultima ragione è che questo progetto potrebbe rappresentare l’unica carta da giocare nel campo della velocità supersonica superiore ai Mach 3, velocità che per inciso non è raggiungibile dal Su-57 ma che potrebbero costituire invece la caratteristica di punta di velivoli UAV sviluppati in futuro da paesi avversari come Stati Uniti, Inghilterra o Cina.
La Russia ha bisogno di un aereo come il PAK-DP che possa sfruttare questa particolare caratteristica al fine di raggiungere rapidamente ogni punto del proprio paese e mantenere sicuro il proprio spazio aereo.

ENGLISH

Russia's state-owned Mikoyan (MiG) company has been working for some time on a new Mach 5 aircraft, the true replacement for the Mig-25 Foxbat and the later Mig-31 Foxhoond.

The MiG-31 (Микояна и Гуревича МиГ-31 in Cyrillic characters, NATO coded "Foxhound", a breed of dog used for fox hunting) is a Soviet-Russian supersonic all-weather interceptor aircraft designed to replace the MiG-25 "Foxbat", designed explicitly to counter strategic bombers and cruise missiles.
The MiG-31 was built in Nizhny Novgorod (then called 'Gorky') and was created in response to a specification from the then Soviet Air Defence Command for a high-performance interceptor that would offer greater flexibility of use and autonomy from fighter-guide stations. The aim was to create an aircraft capable of defending the Soviet Union's airspace from the threat posed by cruise missiles, whether carried by aircraft (such as the Boeing B-52) or launched from land or naval systems (notably the BGM-109 Tomahawk). It is also tasked with intercepting supersonic bombers, such as the Panavia Tornado and B-1.
The starting point was the MiG-25 'Foxbat', an aircraft that already had similar performance to that required. From this base, the MiG office engineers produced a two-seat interceptor, characterised by numerous innovations compared to its predecessor, in particular more powerful engines, a longer range, a reinforced airframe to allow supersonic speeds at low altitudes, and a more powerful weapon system.
The MiG-31's intended engines were the 13,500 kgf Tumansky R-15BF-2-300 with afterburner, but as these had not been tuned, they were replaced with Soloviev D-30F-6 engines of 9,500 kg dry and 15,500 kgf with afterburner. These engines were fitted to the prototype, designated MiG-25MP (later Ye-155MP), which flew for the first time on 16 September 1975.
However, development progressed so slowly that the aircraft did not enter service until 1982. The final version had the internal designation of I-01, and was mass-produced at the Nizhny Novgorod (then called Gorky) aeronautical plant.
In the West, the project became known thanks to information from Lieutenant Pilot Viktor Belenko, who defected in 1976. The first photo (excluding satellite images) was taken in 1985 by a Norwegian pilot.
Total production, which continued slowly after 1991 and ceased completely in 1997, amounted to about 500 units.
The MiG-31 has never been exported outside the Soviet Union. Moreover, even after the dissolution of the Soviet Union, its use continues to be limited to CIS countries: rumours of a 1992 contract with the People's Republic of China (24 units purchased, plus a production licence for another 700) have never been confirmed, and negotiations with Iran for 24 units have not been followed up.
To date, the only nations using the aircraft in their air forces are Russia and Kazakhstan.
Russia is the main user of this aircraft. In fact, 286 aircraft are operational (256 in the air force and 30 in the navy), upgraded to the MiG-31B and MiG-31BS standard.
Kazakhstan received 32 aircraft following the break-up of the Soviet Union. Although these powerful and sophisticated aircraft are probably too large for the needs of the V-VS(QR), they are still in service.
From an operational point of view, the MiG-31 is certainly more capable and versatile than its predecessor. It is, in fact, an aircraft capable of carrying out interception missions in practically any weather situation, capable of engaging adversaries ranging from strategic bombers to cruise missiles. However, it is not an aircraft suitable for manoeuvred combat because of its size and weight.
Today, they are also used (especially in northern Russia) in the role of AWACS aircraft. This is possible thanks to the sophisticated data-link system, which makes it possible to link four MiG-31s together, allowing them to control a front of up to 900 km.
Some 500 were produced, but never used in combat operations.
This aircraft, derived from the MiG-25, has virtually nothing in common with its predecessor. The design is different for a whole series of details.
Titanium (16%), aluminium alloy (33%), arc-welded nickel steel (49%) and composite materials (2%) were used in its construction. This particular composition increases the strength of the structure, and allows the aircraft to reach supersonic speeds even at low altitudes (Mach 1.23, or 1,500 km/h). At high altitude, it can reach Mach 2.83 (3494 km/h), but the theoretical maximum speed would be Mach 3 (reaching it could, however, pose risks to the aircraft's structure).
Its internal fuel capacity is over 20,000 litres, and it has the option of taking two additional tanks under the wings of 2,500 litres each. The basic version has no in-flight refuelling capability.

Armament

The MiG-31's typical mission equipment consists of four Vympel R-33 air-to-air missiles (NATO code name: AA-9 Amos), which have a range of 110-120 km, and four Molniya R-60 (AA-8 Aphid), with a range of 7-12 km. In addition, it is equipped with a GSh-6-23 23 mm internal rotary six-barrel gun (with 260 rounds), which has a stated rate of fire of between 6,000 and 8,000 rounds per minute. The strong point of its armament is undoubtedly its radar, an NIIP SBI-16 Zaslon (NATO code name: 'Flash Dance') equipped with an electronically scanned antenna, with a range of over 200 km in detection and 120 km in tracking. It is said to be the most powerful attack radar in existence: it has the ability to track 10 targets and engage up to four simultaneously, at flight altitudes ranging from 25 to 28,000 metres. However, later versions are said to mount an improved version of the radar, the Zaslon-M, which appears to have a range of 400 km.
Versions:
  • MiG-31 "Foxhound-A" - Basic version, entered service in 1982. Can carry 8 missiles and is equipped with a data-link allowing 4 aircraft to patrol a 900 km front. Equipped with an APD-518 radar system for silent strikes, it can engage up to 4 targets simultaneously.
  • MiG-31LL - One of the first MiG-31 models converted into an experimental aircraft with camera attachments on the wings.
  • MiG-31DZ "Foxhound-A" - Unofficial designation for MiG-31s modified with an in-flight refuelling probe in front of the cockpit.
  • MiG-31B "Foxhound-A" (Izdelye 02) - Introduced in 1990. Improved version of the MiG-31. Mass-produced.
  • MiG-31BS "Foxhound-A" - Version with improved radar, contains some elements of the MiG-31M (same armament and ability to carry four 2,250-litre subalar tanks).
  • MiG-31E - Export version remained without follow-up. One example built.
  • MiG-31M "Foxhound-B" (Izdelye 05) - 7 prototypes built. Can engage 6 targets simultaneously. Not produced in series due to the collapse of the USSR. Development began in 1983 and the first flight was in 1986. This is a more sophisticated aircraft, it has a fully retractable in-flight refuelling probe, a new control system and a MIIP S-800 Zaslon-M radar, with more sophisticated functions. The radar can track up to 10 targets simultaneously and engage 4 of them. The armament foreseen is 4 Vympel R-37 (AA-X-13) and 4 Vympel R-77 (AA-12 Adder). It was built in 7 examples, but was not followed up. For the cannon, the firing rate on the MiG-31M is a theoretical 12,000 rounds/min.
  • MiG-31D (Izdelye 07) - 2 modified and tested examples between 1986 and 1987. They can carry a missile with anti-satellite capability. The programme was suspended with the cancellation of the American SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) programme.
  • MiG-31BM - Multi-role version. Testing for the upgrade was completed in 1999. It is a multi-role fighter that is also capable of hitting ground targets. The main upgrade consists of an on-board computer and radar capable of activating both air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles simultaneously. In interception operations, it can engage up to 24 targets simultaneously.
  • MiG-31FE "Foxhound-B" - Multi-role export version of the MiG-31BM.
  • MiG-31A (MiG-31S)
  • MiG-31D version modified to launch a satellite.

Incidents: A MiG-31 crashed on 6 September 2011 over the Urals and both crew members died; pending the outcome of the investigation the entire MiG-31 fleet has been grounded.

Users:
  • Kazakhstan Sil Vozdushnoy Oborony Respubliki Kazakhstan
  • 32 ex-Soviet MiG-31s received since 1997. One of 21 in service as of December 2019 was lost in April 2020.
  • Russia Voenno-vozdušnye sily Rossijskoj Federacii - ~120 examples in service as of 2016. Initially there were to be 110 aircraft upgraded to the MiG-31BM version, but in June 2020 it was announced that the upgrade would be extended to 130 examples. - Aviacija Voenno-Morskogo Flota.
Russia has long sought the replacement of its aging MiG-31 fighter fleet to develop a new long-range interceptor, which will seek to build on the core concept of the MiG-31. The country's MiG-31 fighter fleet is expected to retire by 2028.
Some Russian reports had also claimed that the new PAK-DP could be developed into an unmanned fighter in the future. The head of the MiG factory during a defence exhibition in 2017 said it would be a completely new aircraft, "where completely new technologies will be applied to work in the Arctic sphere".
He said the PAK-DP will guard "the entire border of our homeland, then it will be transferred to the unmanned project".
If a Russian Izvestia newspaper is to be believed, the MiG-41 will become a hypersonic missile interceptor carrying a multifunctional long-range interceptor missile system (MPKR DP) that will deliver several sub-missiles to increase the chances of hypersonic weapon interception.
The document goes on to explain the concept: 'after a hypersonic projectile is detected by Russia's ground radar or early warning network, the MiG-41 will launch the long-range interceptor missile. That missile will split into smaller sub-missiles, which will then attack the projectile 'head-on'.
The head of the Russian Aircraft Corporation Ilya Tarasenko had once said that the new MiG-41 would be equipped with an anti-missile laser and would be able to operate at very high altitudes and also in near space. He also indicated to a Russian RIA Novosti outlet that the PAK DP can operate in space.
The PAK DP, or MiG-41, will have" the ability to operate in space, new weapons, new speed, new operational range, Tarasenko told the Zvezda TV channel.
The fighter's predecessor, the MiG-31, has the reputation of being a long-range supersonic fighter-interceptor, designed for use against both high- and low-altitude aerial targets, introduced into the Soviet army as early as 1980. The MiG-41, when ready, will remain Russia's main interceptor until the 1930s.
According to the commander of the Russian Air Force, the aircraft is scheduled to be introduced into service in 2025.
To be a formidable interceptor, the PAK-DP will need to have very high speed and the ability to fly at extremely high altitudes to be able to neutralise ultrafast targets at high altitudes. This will also require new weapons and upgraded on-board radar systems.
Not much is known about the weapons the MiG-41 will carry, although the head of Russia's aerospace forces told the media this year that the fighter will carry R-37 long-range air-to-air missiles, "as well as completely new missiles.
Russia's Izvestia news agency had also reported that the MiG-41 will carry a "multifunctional long-range interceptor missile system capable of hitting hypersonic missiles" with multiple warheads.
Media reports indicated that the fighter's design had already been finalised by the end of 2019, and Tarasenko had told reporters that development was underway in June this year. However, there are considerable doubts about all the claims made about which new MiG-41 technologies will be armed.
Media reports believe that Russia's development of an unmanned version of the PAK DP is unlikely in such a situation, considering that it requires significant technical effort and considerable resources, which are lacking in today's Russia.
The lack of fresh news on the development of the new strategic interceptor programme could indicate delays or technical difficulties in the project. Pilots and aircraft manufacturers have made very few statements about the capabilities of this project. If all goes according to plan, Russia will have the most advanced interceptor and the most sophisticated fighter in the world by 2030 (maybe)!
A new generation of fighter-interceptor, stealth, hypersonic speed and remote piloting is needed to defend Russia's extensive borders. But what if it is not necessary and the available means are sufficient? Just recently, a well-known industry magazine reported that Russia is continuing to work on the new MiG-41, also known as the PAK DP, a fighter-interceptor. The new stealth bomber is called the PAK DA. 
News about this aircraft they call MiG-41 is scarce. 
In 2018, the general director of a Russian company, reiterated that work on the development of the PAK DP had begun and the Russian Ministry of Defence would select the most interesting projects from MiG and Sukhoi: work in this direction continues.
In the 2000s, a number of projects were launched in Russia, involving the development of new aeronautical technologies united by the principle of the PAK, a Russian acronym meaning Future Air System. The best known of these is the PAK FA, the frontline aircraft we all know as the Su-57 Felon.
In addition to the PAK FA, work was also started on other strategic projects such as the PAK DA (a long-range heavy strategic bomber-vector), the PAK TA (a transport aircraft that will replace the An-124 Ruslan), and the PAK DP (the Russian answer to the US SR-72 Aurora, a long-range fighter-interceptor that will replace the MiG-31 by the end of the 2020s).
Russia's geo-strategic situation has an important impact on long-range fighter-interceptors. The huge uninhabited expanses in the far north, without anti-aircraft defence systems, would allow hostile intercontinental bombers to effortlessly penetrate the central areas of the country. The deployment of a network of radars in the north has resolved the question of detecting possible air attacks, and two options have been explored to counter them:
  • The installation of a large number of anti-aircraft defence systems (however, with a disadvantage, namely their limited range);
  • The creation of an interceptor aircraft with a significant flight range capable of remaining in the combat area for a long time and, if enemy bombers were detected, of intercepting and destroying them.
Towards the end of the 1950s, the Tu-128, a long-range heavy fighter with a flight range of over 2,500 km and capable of carrying long-range air-to-air missiles, was developed in the Soviet Union. In the 1980s, the Tu-128 was gradually replaced in the northern areas of the country by the MiG-31, the most advanced strategic interceptor at the time.
This aircraft was unique in that it had: 
  • a speed of over 3,000 km/h, 
  • a significant flight range, 
  • the ability to engage in aerial combat with any contemporary aircraft, 
  • the function of 'flying radar' and a control centre capable of directing other aircraft towards enemy air targets. 
Four MiG-31s were able to control up to 1,000 km of air front via their radar.
This aircraft, with the new MiG-31BM version, ensures that they will remain at the forefront for a long time to come. However, the problem is that the MiG-31 has never been equipped with stealth technology, and will have more difficulty countering fifth-generation aircraft. 
The PAK-DP, which is designed to replace the MiG-31, will not only have to borrow all the high-quality features from the MiG-31, but also some new ones: it will have to be a sixth-generation fighter and will have to be used in both piloted and unmanned versions. 
Through the new aircraft's artificial intelligence, it will be possible to operate the aircraft by remote control from the ground or from another aircraft, and it will be possible to carry out autonomous unmanned operations. Clearly, this will significantly simplify the handling of the aircraft for the pilot, who will be able to pay more attention to the control of weapons systems and the overview of the surrounding air situation. In this regard, it is likely that the MiG-41, unlike the MiG-31 and Tu-128, will become a single-seat aircraft. Previous strategic interceptors, on the other hand, were always flown by two pilots.
The PAK DP's assumed flight altitude will be over 30 km, while its speed will be Mach 4+. At present, only ballistic and hypersonic missiles fly at this speed. Reaching such speeds is impossible without the adoption of new engines and without a particular conformation of the aircraft that will have to reduce aerodynamic resistance to a minimum with the use of materials able to contain the thermal overheating generated at such high speeds.
Aircraft such as the MiG-25, MiG-31 or the US SR-71 Blackbird, as a rule, were characterised not only by their unusual shape, but were also equipped with special heat-resistant steel and titanium alloys. Steel will certainly remain present in the future Mig-41, but most of the structure will have to be made of new composite materials and 'metamaterials'.
The MiG-41, like the MiG-31, will have to carry long-range interceptor missiles that guarantee the destruction of aerial targets at distances of over 300 km. This aircraft should be a versatile platform for intercepting not only classic air targets, but also hypersonic and space targets. The possibility of an assault version of this aircraft equipped with air-to-surface missiles cannot be ruled out either.
According to Russian aerospace executives, work on the project will not be completed until 2025. After that, deliveries of the new aircraft to the Russian Federation's aerospace forces will probably begin, provided that all the technical problems encountered in the project are successfully resolved. In addition to the purely technical challenges to be overcome by the designers, there is a further problem: at present it is still not entirely clear whether the Russian Air Force needs such a unique and expensive aircraft.
In military aviation globally, there is a general tendency to make aircraft as versatile as possible. And sooner or later, all developers in the industry come to this conclusion, because as the generations go by, it costs more and more to create a new aircraft. This can already be seen with the US F-35 and the Russian Su-57, both of which can successfully carry out assault missions and engage in aerial combat. The PAK DP, on the other hand, will not be a versatile aircraft. Rather, it will establish itself as an elitist 'prince'.
Moreover, many of the gaps in area air defence can be filled by less expensive and already operational anti-aircraft systems. But if the PAK DP project is given the green light, we are likely to witness a new quantum leap in aviation development in the next decade.
At present, the Russian company Rostec has finalised the design phase and started the subsequent R&D phase for the project concerning the new long-range interceptor that will replace the current MiG-31 FOXHOUND. The project, officially named MiG-41/PAK-DP (an acronym that stands for "future long-range interceptor aircraft system"), foresees the development of a "new generation" aircraft. Although its characteristics have not yet been made official, as already highlighted above, it is likely that it will be a conventionally piloted stealth aircraft (perhaps removable), almost certainly twin-engined (probably with scramjet propulsion), capable of reaching speeds close to hypersonic. Similarly to the MiG-31 - and its predecessor the MiG-25 - the MiG-41 will act as a launch pad for the R-37/R-37M long-range air-to-air missiles against classic air threats, such as tactical/strategic bombers and reconnaissance aircraft. Unlike FOXHOUND and FOXBAT, however, the aircraft will also be used against hypersonic (aircraft and missiles) and space (satellites) threats. 

The MiG-41 could be armed with the new MPKR-DP air-to-air missile, also under development, with a minimum range of 300 km, equipped with a multiple warhead with sub-munitions separable from the main missile body in order to increase its impact capabilities against hypersonic targets. As already mentioned, it cannot be ruled out that the Mig-41 could be optimised with secondary air-to-ground capabilities and direct energy (laser) weaponry. On paper, it will be a 6th generation aircraft, whose capabilities would complement those of the Su-57 FELON, an aircraft with a more multi-role vocation compared to what should be a pure interceptor.

The Mikoyan MiG-41 is a Russian Stealth interceptor/heavy fighter aircraft being developed by Mikoian, under the PAK DP programme (Russian: ПАК ДП, short for: Перспективный авиационный комплекс дальнего перехвата, romanized: Perspektivny aviatsionny Kompleks dal'nego perekhvata, illuminated '' complex air perspective long-range interceptor''), which is proposed to replace the Mikoyan MiG-31 in the Russian Air Force in the mid-2020s. According to Russian defence analyst Vasily Kashin, the MiG-41 would be considered a 5+ or 6th generation project.
Work on the PAK DP MiG-41 supersonic interceptor is making use of the MiG-701 (Izdeliye7.01), Mikoyan MiG-301 and Mikoyan MiG-321 projects that began in the 1990s.
As of July 2016, not much information was available other than the statement that such an aircraft is planned for development, no official data on its capabilities was available. It has been speculated that it could enter service by the mid-2020s or 2030s. As an interceptor, its main mission was said to be to offset future reconnaissance aircraft currently under development by the United States of America and China. In order to achieve the high speeds rumoured for the aircraft, it should be equipped with ramjet or turboramjet engines.
The design of the MiG-41 was finalised by the end of 2019, at the same time as the research work was completed. In 2020, within that research framework, the Russian Ministry of Defence selected the most promising project. Work in this area now continues in research and development. Ilya Tarasenko, the general director of the MiG corporation as well as the head of the Sukhoi company, said in an interview in July 2020 that the PAK DP will be designed based on the Mig-31 design.
According to Izvestia, the MiG-41 is expected to become a hypersonic missile interceptor by carrying a multifunctional long-range interceptor missile system (MPKR DP) that will deliver several sub-missiles to increase the chances of intercepting hypersonic weapons.  The PAK DP is also intended to carry anti-satellite missiles. 
In January 2021, Rostec Corporation, owner of Mikoyan, announced that the MiG-41 had now entered the development phase, stating that "the development of the next generation of interceptor fighters has already begun. The PAK DP project with the designation 'MiG-41' is in the development phase of the work. 
In an interview for Russia Today, the general director of RSK MiG, Ilya Tarasenko, said it would be a new build capable of Mach number 4-4.3, equipped with an anti-missile laser, and said it would be able to operate at very high altitudes and also in near space. He also said it could be upgraded to an unmanned version at a later date. If purchased by the Russian Air Force, he said the first production MiG-41 would be completed in 2025.
The aircraft will probably cruise at speeds of at least Mach 3 (3,675 km/h; 2,284 mph) and fly at high altitudes (at levels between the stratopause and tropopause, i.e. below 45,000 metres and above 12,000 metres) to cover most of Russia's vast territory in the shortest period of time. It could use the Izdeliye 30 engines currently under development for the Su-57.  The MiG-41 will use stealth technology. 
According to Avia Pro, the MiG-41 will be built on the basis of the Su-57 fighter, with a different configuration and a modified airframe so that it can reach a top speed of over 6,100 km/h (Mach 4.9) and a cruising speed of 2,500-3,000 km/h (Mach 2-2.4). Experts do not rule out that the design of the MiG-41 will be similar to the appearance of the Su-57 and MiG-31.  An unmanned version is also under consideration. 
MiG Aircraft Corporation is working on the MiG-41, a future fifth-generation interceptor fighter project, Russian MiG company CEO Ilya Tarasenko told TASS news agency.
"No, this is not a mythical project," said Tarasenko, "on the contrary, it is a long-standing project for our bureau but we are only now seriously pursuing this work under the auspices of the UAC and it will soon be presented to the public."
In fact, the future replacement of the MiG-31 interceptor has been planned for several years and the PAK-DP project (Predpolagayemyy vozdukha Kompleks dlya Dal'ney Perekhvat, in Italian Futuro sistema aereo di intercettazione a lungo raggio, continuing the similarity of the acronyms with the new PAK-FA, PAK-DA and PAK-TA projects, respectively Russian fighter, bomber and transport aircraft of future conception) will have its raison d'être in the realisation of the new MiG-41.
The MiG-41 should be equipped with new long-range air-to-air missiles and a new category of laser weapons, should have space capability (i.e. at altitudes between stratopause and tropopause, i.e. below 45,000 metres and above 12,000 metres), radar invisibility, significantly increased range and a very high top speed between Mach 4 and 4. 3, so much so that in order to support the pilot in his operations, it may be necessary to adopt unspecified artificial intelligence elements incorporated into some of the MiG-41's avionics, and also, according to statements made by Tarasenko at the end of last year, completely new technologies to operate in the Arctic zone to protect national borders at any latitude.
Among the many projects listed above, we are certain that the PAK-DP/MiG-41 is of fundamental strategic importance for the Russian Armed Forces, so much so that we can bet on its realisation, even if not in a very short time (in fact, we recall that the latest update of the MiG-31, called BM, should allow them to operate until 2025-2030).
There are many reasons why the project cannot be postponed: first of all, Russia has such a vast continental territory that such a project cannot be concluded with the end of the operational life of the MiG-31; its replacement could certainly be postponed by possible further updates of the "Foxhound", but also for the latter the word will come to an end and the MiG-41 will have to be built without any ifs or buts.
The MiG-41 could exploit the multi-role nature of the previous MiG-25 and MiG-31 machines (the latter, for example, with the recent K version suitable for launching the Kinžal air-to-ground cruise missile), thus expanding the VKS's range of stand-off attack operations with a fifth-generation machine equipped with supersonic speed.
Another valid reason is that Russia wishes to keep the legacy of the MiG bureau alive within the United Aircraft Corporation (UAC). With Sukhoi playing the sole and main role in the PAK FA (Su-57) project, MiG needs a new generation project to work on. The MiG-35, although advanced, does not yet belong to the family of future next-generation projects and the PAK-DP is the right direction for the MiG company to take, building on the experience gained in the past with the MiG-25/31.
A final reason is that this project could represent the only card to play in the field of supersonic speed above Mach 3, a speed that incidentally is not achievable by the Su-57 but that could instead constitute the leading feature of UAVs developed in the future by rival countries such as the US, England or China.
Russia needs an aircraft like the PAK-DP that can exploit this particular feature in order to quickly reach anywhere in its country and keep its airspace safe.

(Web, Google, RID, Analisidifesa, Sputnik, Wikipedia, You Tube)