venerdì 15 maggio 2020

Il Mark V è un carro armato britannico sviluppato ed utilizzato durante la prima guerra mondiale


Il Mark V è un carro armato britannico sviluppato ed utilizzato durante la prima guerra mondiale.

Impiego in battaglia

Il Mark V debuttò in combattimento nella battaglia di Hamel il 4 luglio 1918, in circa 60 esemplari. Da allora i Mk V furono utilizzati dai britannici in altre 8 importanti battaglie prima della fine della Grande Guerra. Durante la battaglia di Amiens nell'agosto 1918, 288 carri armati Mark V, insieme ai nuovi Whippet e Mk V, penetrarono le linee tedesche segnando l'inizio della moderna guerra corazzata e la fine della guerra di trincea.



Circa 70 carri Mark V vennero forniti dal Regno Unito all'Armata Bianca come sostegno ai controrivoluzionari bianchi ed in seguito catturati dall'Armata Rossa durante la guerra civile russa ed impiegati dai sovietici nel 1921 durante l'invasione della Georgia, contribuendo alla vittoria sovietica nella battaglia di Tbilisi. L'ultimo uso confermato dei carri Mk V in battaglia da parte dell'Armata Rossa fu durante la difesa di Tallinn contro l'invasione tedesca nell'agosto 1941. Quattro carri Mark V furono usati in Estonia come fortificazioni scavate.



Nel 1945 le truppe alleate si imbatterono in due carri armati Mk V pesantemente danneggiati a Berlino. Prove fotografiche indicarono successivamente che questi carri erano sopravvissuti alla guerra civile russa ed erano stati disposti come monumento a Smolensk, in Russia, prima di essere stati portati a Berlino dopo l'invasione tedesca dell'Unione Sovietica nel 1941. Non è stato invece segnalato il loro utilizzo nella battaglia di Berlino.




ENGLISH

The British Mark V tank was an upgraded version of the Mark IV tank. It was first deployed in 1918, used in action during the closing months of World War I, and in the Allied intervention in the Russian Civil War on the White Russian side, and by the Red Army, after they were captured. The tank was improved in several aspects, chiefly the new steering system and engine, but it fell short in other areas such as mechanical reliability and its insufficient ventilation. However, the Mark V was successful, especially given its limited service history, and primitive design.




History

The Mark V was, at first, intended to be a completely new design of tank, of which a wooden mock-up had been completed; however, when the new engine and transmission originally planned for the Mark IV became available in December 1917, the first, more advanced Mark V design was abandoned to avoid disrupting production. The designation "Mark V" was switched to an improved version of the Mark IV, equipped with the new systems. The original design of the Mark IV was to have been a large improvement on the Mark III, but had been scaled back due to technical delays. The Mark V thus turned out very similar to the original design of the Mark IV – i.e. a greatly modified Mark III.
Production of the Mark V started at Metropolitan Carriage and Wagon at the end of 1917; the first tanks arrived in France in May 1918. Four hundred were built, 200 Males and Females; the "Males" armed with 6-pounder (57 mm) guns and machine guns, the "Females" with machine guns only. Several were converted to Hermaphrodites (sometimes known as "Mark V Composite") by fitting one male and one female sponson. This measure was intended to ensure that female tanks would not be outgunned when faced with captured British male tanks in German use, or the Germans' own A7V.



The Mark V was to be followed by the more advanced Tank Mark VI, but this was abandoned in December 1917, to ensure sufficient production by British, American, and French factories of the Tank Mark VIII for a planned 1919 offensive. However, the war ended in November 1918, and few Mark VIIIs would be built (most of those completed in Britain were immediately scrapped). The Mark V was also the basis of the Mark IX tank, a dedicated armoured personnel carrier, but only 34 were completed by the end of the war. After the war, most of the British Army's tank units were disbanded, leaving five tank battalions equipped with either the Mark V or the Medium Mark C. The British Army's interest shifted more to lighter, faster tanks, and the Mark V was partially replaced by the Vickers Medium Mark I during the mid-1920s. The Vickers A1E1 Independent reached prototype stage in 1926, but it was abandoned for lack of funds. The remaining Mark Vs appear to have been replaced by medium tanks by the end of the decade.

Modifications

In early 1917, some British tanks were tested with experimental powerplant and transmissions ordered by Albert Stern. These included petrol-electric schemes, hydraulic systems, a multiple clutch system, and an epicyclic gearbox from Major W.G. Wilson. Though the petrol-electrics had advantages, Wilson's design was capable of production and was selected for use in future tanks.
The Mark V had more power (150 bhp) from a new Ricardo engine (also ordered by Stern). Use of Wilson's epicyclic steering gear meant that only a single driver was needed. On the roof towards the rear of the tank, behind the engine, was a second raised cabin, with hinged sides that allowed the crew to attach the unditching beam without exiting the vehicle. An additional machine-gun mount was fitted at the rear of the hull.

Unresolved issues

The Ricardo engine was still in the centre of the crew compartment which led to miserable crew conditions from its heat output. The noise also interfered with crew communication.
The second problem with the Ricardo engine was related to its reliability, or lack thereof. The Ricardo engine was of a somewhat unorthodox design, but it was highly efficient and, with proper care and attention, most of the issues could be mitigated. However, during combat proper maintenance, while important, was the least of the crew's concerns.
The ventilation was the area in which the Mark V suffered its largest weakness. The previous Marks I-IV drew cooling air from inside the tank, through the radiator, and then expelled the air through a vent, which provided a constant supply of moving air for the crew. In contrast, the Mark V, drew air from outside the tank, across the radiator, and then expelled the air though a vent, which left the air inside the crew compartment stagnant. The only ventilation for the crew compartment, other than the driver and gunner view-ports, located on all sides of the tank, was a roof-mounted Keith fan. This fan was inadequate for maintaining a stable supply of clean air for the crew of a Mark V; exhaust and gun-smoke were trapped with the crew, which caused many crewmen to grow ill and, in the most extreme cases, was enough to render them unconscious; either way the crew was practically unfit for combat within a few hours.

Variants

Mark V

In an attempt to stop the tank threat, the German Army began digging wider trenches that made it difficult for tanks to cross. For example, trenches in the Hindenburg Line were widened to 11 or 12 feet, which was more than the British tanks' 10 feet trench-crossing ability. To counter this, Sir William Tritton developed the Tadpole Tail, an extension of the tracks to be fitted to the back of a tank, this lengthened the tank by about 9 feet. It was also hoped that this longer tank might carry a squad of infantry with Vickers or Lewis machine guns, but the conditions inside were so extreme that the men became ill, after some early experiments, and although several hundred were manufactured, the idea was abandoned. This in turn caused Major Philip Johnson of the Central Tank Corps Workshops to devise a plan of his own. He cut a Mark IV in half and inserted three extra panels, lengthening the hull by six feet. (It was believed for a long time that most Mark V* had been field conversions made by Johnson. It is now known that they were all new, factory-built to a new design). The Mark V* had a reshaped rear cupola incorporating 2 extra machine-gun mounts, a door in each side of the hull, with an extra machine-gun mount on each. This tank weighed 33 tons. The total orders for the Mark V* were 500 Males and 200 Females, 579 had been built by the Armistice – the order was completed by Metropolitan Carriage in March 1919. Shortly before the end of the War, Britain supplied France with 90 Mk V*. They were not used in action, but remained in French service throughout the 1920s and 30s.

Mark V

Because the Mark V* had been lengthened, its original length-width ratio had been spoiled. Lateral forces in a turn now became unacceptably high causing thrown tracks and an enormous turning circle. Therefore, Major Wilson redesigned the track in May 1918, with a stronger curve to the lower run reducing ground contact (but increasing ground pressure as a trade-off) and the tracks were widened to 26.5 inches. The Mark V engine was bored out to give 225 hp and sat further back in the hull. The cabin for the driver was combined with the commander's cabin; there now was a separate machine gun position in the back. Of a revised order for 700 tanks (150 Females and 550 Males) only 25 were built and only one of those by the end of 1918.

Combat history

The Mk V made its combat debut during the Battle of Hamel on 4 July 1918, approximately 60 tanks, many of them Mark V's, successfully supported Australian troops in an action that repaired the Australians' confidence in tanks, which had been badly damaged at Bullecourt. Thereafter Mk Vs were used in eight major actions before the end of the war.
During the Battle of Amiens in August 1918, 288 Mark V tanks, along with the new Whippet and Mk V*, penetrated the German lines in a foretaste of modern armoured warfare, and signaled the end of trench warfare.
The American 301st Heavy Tank Battalion was equipped with 19 Mark V and 21 Mark V* tanks in their first heavy tank action against the Hindenburg Line on 27 September 1918. Of the 21 Mark V* tanks, 9 were hit by artillery rounds (one totally destroyed), 2 hit British mines, 5 had mechanical problems, and 2 ditched in trenches. The battalion, however, did reach its objective.
Approximately 70 Mark V tanks supplied by Great Britain to the White Russian Army and subsequently captured by the Red Army in the course of the Russian Civil War were used in 1921 during the Red Army invasion of Georgia and contributed to the Soviet victory in the battle for Tbilisi.
The last confirmed use of the Mk V in battle was by units of the Red Army during the defence of Tallinn against German forces in August 1941. The four Mk Vs previously operated by Estonia were used as dug-in fortifications. It is believed that they were subsequently scrapped.
In 1945, Allied troops came across two badly damaged Mk V tanks in Berlin. Photographic evidence indicates that these were survivors of the Russian Civil War and had previously been displayed as a monument in Smolensk, Russia, before being brought to Berlin after the German invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941. Accounts of their active involvement in the Battle of Berlin have not been verified.

Surviving vehicles

Eleven Mark V tanks survive. The majority are in Russia or Ukraine and are survivors of the tanks sent there to aid the White forces during the Russian Civil War.
The Tank Museum, Bovington displays a Mark V Male, Number 9199. It was in action at the Battle of Amiens where its commander – Lt. HA Whittenbury – was awarded the Military Cross. It was subsequently damaged by artillery at Bellicourt in September 1918, during the Hundred Days Offensive. It has been at Bovington since 1925, and was used for demonstrations and filming. While this tank is maintained in running condition, the Bovington museum had made the decision to not run it again, because of the wear and tear that would be inflicted on the now-fragile, historic vehicle.
A heavily restored Mark V Male, Devil, survives at the London Imperial War Museum. The right sponson was removed to allow a view of the tank's interior, but in the Museum's 2013 - 2014 refit the vehicle was resited in such a way that the interior is no longer visible to the public:
  • A Mark V Composite is at the Kubinka Tank Museum, Russia.
  • A Mark V Female serves as memorial in Arkhangelsk. This was originally used by British forces during the Allied Intervention in the Russian Civil War.
  • Two preserved Mark Vs, both Composites, form part of an outdoor memorial at Luhansk in Ukraine. Two more are in storage.
  • A Mark V Composite is at the M. F. Sumtsov Kharkiv Historical Museum, Ukraine.
  • A Mark V* Male, Number 9591, has been part of the collection of the National Armor and Cavalry Museum, Fort Benning, Georgia since 2010. Issued to Company A, US 301st Heavy Tank Battalion and hit by a 57 mm (2 in) shell round on 27 September 1918 during the attack against the Hindenburg Line, it was repaired and sent back to the United States. It is the only surviving example of the Mark V.
  • A Mark V Female: Ol'Faithful, is also preserved at Bovington. It never saw action during the war, but post–war was fitted with hydraulic lifting gear so it could carry and deploy portable bridges, and carry out other engineering tasks. During World War 2, it was used as a ballast weight to test Bailey bridges.


(Web, Google, Wikipedia, You Tube)
















































giovedì 14 maggio 2020

US NAVY: una nuova C.O.C. integrata e nuovi sistemi di navigazione per i DDG classe Arleigh Burke


La Northrop Grumman fornirà alla Us Navy una nuova C.O.C. integrata e nuovi sistemi di navigazione per i DDG classe Arleigh Burke.



Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Charlottesville, Virginia, si è aggiudicata un contratto per sistemi integrati di ponte e navigazione “New Construction Ship Program Midlife Modernization Program per i DDG classe Arleigh Burke.



I cacciatorpediniere missilistici classe Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) forniscono una vasta gamma di capacità di combattimento in ambienti multi-minaccia aerea, di superficie e ASW. Queste navi rispondono a scenari di conflitto a bassa intensità / costiera e costiera offshore, nonché a conflitti in mare aperto indipendentemente o come unità di  scorta per Carrier Strike Group, Surface Action Groups e Expeditionary Strike Groups. Intitolata al famoso ufficiale della seconda guerra mondiale ed ex capo delle operazioni navali, ammiraglio Arleigh Burke, questa classe offre eccezionali capacità di combattimento e caratteristiche di sopravvivenza tenendo conto dei costi di approvvigionamento e di supporto del ciclo di vita.



I cacciatorpediniere classe Arleigh Burke sono equipaggiati con il sistema di armi Aegis della US NAVY, il più potente sistema d’armi navali integrato al mondo. Una volta integrata con il sistema Aegis Combat System, la Cooperative Engagement Capability consentirà ai gruppi di navi e aeromobili di collegare i loro radar per fornire un quadro composito dello spazio di battaglia, aumentando efficacemente lo spazio di teatro. La capacità è progettata per fornire alla Marina statunitense un vantaggio nel combattimento del 21° secolo.
Come la maggior parte delle moderne unità da guerra di superficie della Marina statunitense, la classe Arleigh Burke utilizza la propulsione a mezzo turbina a gas, impiegando quattro turbine LM Electric General 2500 per complessivi 100.000 CV di potenza; queste navi sono in grado di raggiungere oltre 30 nodi di velocità in mare aperto.
La classe Arleigh Burke utilizza una struttura interamente in acciaio e comprende quattro varianti separate: 
  • DDG 51-71 rappresentano il design originale e sono designati come navi del Flight I; 
  • DDG 72-78 sono navi del Flight II; 
  • I DDG 79-116 sono navi di Flight IIA in servizio e continueranno attraverso i DDG 124 e 127. 
  • La linea di base del Flight III inizierà con i DDG 125-126, continuerà con i DDG 128 e seguirà. 
  • La prima nave Flight III, DDG 125, è stata impostata il 7 maggio 2018.



L'aggiornamento del DDG 51 Flight III è incentrato sul sistema radar AMDR / SPY-6 (V) 1 Air e sul Missile Defense che offre capacità migliorate rispetto alle navi DDG 51 Flight IIA. L'AMDR consente alle navi Flight III di eseguire simultaneamente Anti-Air Warfare e la Ballistic Missile Defense, il che soddisfa l'esigenza fondamentale della US NAVY di potenziare la capacità di combattimento aereo integrato e di difesa missilistica.



Sessantasette navi della classe DDG 51 sono state consegnate alla flotta (DDG 51-DDG 117). Ventuno navi sono attualmente in fase di costruzione con i costruttori navali Huntington Ingalls Industries, Ingalls Shipbuilding e General Dynamics Bath Iron Works, tra cui il recente riconoscimento di 11 navi Flight III nell'ambito dell'acquisto pluriennale 2018-2022. MYP continua gli acquisti per il collaudato programma di costruzione navale DDG 51 Class, sfruttando la concorrenza, una solida base industriale e un design stabile al fine di ottenere risparmi.



ENGLISH

Northrop Grumman Systems Corp., Charlottesville, Virginia, is awarded a $27,430,321 firm-fixed-price, cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost-only modification to previously awarded contract N00024-19-C-4101 to exercise options to procure integrated bridge and navigation systems for the DDG-51 guided missile destroyer New Construction Ship Program and DDG-51 Midlife Modernization Program with physical throttles kits and engineering services.
The Arleigh Burke (DDG 51) class guided missile destroyers provide a wide range of warfighting capabilities in multi-threat air, surface and subsurface environments. These ships respond to Low Intensity Conflict/Coastal and Littoral Offshore Warfare (LIC/CALOW) scenarios as well as open-ocean conflict independently or as units of Carrier Strike Groups (CSG), Surface Action Groups (SAG), and Expeditionary Strike Groups (ESG). Named after famed World War II Officer and former Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral Arleigh Burke, this class provides outstanding combat capability and survivability characteristics while considering procurement and life cycle support costs.
Arleigh Burke class destroyers are equipped with the Navy’s Aegis Weapon System, the world’s foremost integrated naval weapon system. When integrated with the Aegis Combat System, the Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) will permit groups of ships and aircraft to link their radars to provide a composite picture of the battle space, effectively increasing the theater space. The capability is designed to provide the Navy with a 21st century fighting edge.
Like most modern U.S. Navy surface combatants, the Arleigh Burke class utilizes gas turbine propulsion. Employing four General Electric LM 2500 gas turbine engines to produce 100,000 total shaft horsepower via a dual shaft design, these ships are capable of achieving 30-plus knot speeds in open seas.
The Arleigh Burke class employs all-steel construction and comprises four separate variants or "Flights." DDG 51-71 represent the original design and are designated as Flight I ships; DDG 72-78 are Flight II ships; DDGs 79-116 are Flight IIA ships in service, and will continue through DDGs 124 and 127. The Flight III baseline will begin with DDGs 125-126, and continue with DDGs 128 and follow. The first Flight III ship, DDG 125, started fabrication May 07, 2018.
The DDG 51 Flight III upgrade is centered on the AMDR/SPY-6(V)1 Air and Missile Defense radar system that provides improved capability over DDG 51 Flight IIA ships. The AMDR enables Flight III ships to simultaneously perform Anti-Air Warfare (AAW) and Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD), which satisfies the Navy’s critical need for an enhanced surface combatant Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) capability.
Sixty-seven DDG 51 class ships have been delivered to the fleet (DDG 51-DDG 117). Twenty-one ships are currently under construction contract with shipbuilders Huntington Ingalls Industries, Ingalls Shipbuilding, and General Dynamics Bath Iron Works including the recent award of 11 Flight III ships under the FY 2018-2022 Multiyear Procurement. The MYP continues the procurement for the proven DDG 51 Class shipbuilding program, leveraging competition, a strong industrial base and a stable design in order to achieve savings.

(Web, Google, Wikipedia, Navyrecognition, You Tube)































Il MALAFON (contrazione di MArine LAtécoère FONd) della Marine Nationale


Il MALAFON (contrazione di MArine LAtécoère FONd) è stato sviluppato per rispondere alle capacità di rilevamento dei sottomarini, notevolmente aumentate con l'arrivo del sonar rimorchiato. 

Poiché i siluri, i mortai e altri lanciarazzi hanno una portata molto limitata, si è pensato di mettere a punto un missile dotato di siluro ASW.
Iniziarono quindi gli studi per rispondere al programma. Numerosi lanci furono effettuati nel centro di prova di Ile du Levant e sull'Ile d'Oléron. Dopo i test operativi effettuati sulla nave La Galissonnière, il sistema entrò in servizio nella Marine Nationale nel 1966: fu il primo missile di design nazionale utilizzato dalla Marina francese.
Il suo utilizzo si interruppe nel 1997 per essere sostituito con l'elicottero Lynx che lo soppiantò nella caccia ai sommergibili. Il suo successore designato, il Milas non entrerà mai in servizio nella Marine  Nationale in quanto la Francia si è ritirò dal programma nel 1998 lasciando il progetto all’Italia.
Il Malafon ha la forma di un aliante, la cui parte anteriore è costituita da un siluro antisommergibile di tipo L4 convenzionale.
Veniva installato su di una rampa circolare mobile e veniva lanciato con una elevazione di 15° verso il bersaglio designato. Veniva azionato durante i primi 4 secondi di volo da un doppio booster, rilasciato una volta raggiunta la velocità di 230 metri al secondo (828 km / h) e l'altitudine di 200 metri. Il missile terminava la sua corsa sospesa, stabilizzata in quota da un pilota automatico. Nei pressi dell'obiettivo, l'apertura di un paracadute frenava improvvisamente l'arma e provocava la separazione del siluro che, guidato dal proprio sonar attivo, si lanciava alla ricerca dell’obiettivo ostile descrivendo una traiettoria subacquea a spirale.
Durante il suo volo, il Malafon poteva ricevere, tramite collegamento radio, elementi di correzione della rotta destinati a mantenerlo nella direzione desiderata. Questi elementi erano elaborati da un computer, sovrapponendo la posizione del sottomarino fornita dal sonar e quella del missile trasmessa dalla sorveglianza di superficie o dal radar di tiro. Una luce luminosa, alle estremità di ogni ala, facilitava il controllo visivo della traiettoria.



Le struttura molto ingombrante del sistema d’arma antisom consentiva solo di l’imbarco su navi di un certo tonnellaggio.
Il sistema ASW comprendeva:
  • apparecchiature elettroniche in parte situate nel centro operativo;
  • una rampa di lancio telecomandata che poteva essere ruotata in modo circolare;
  • Un imponente deposito in coperta per la manutenzione che poteva contenere 13 missili smontati che dovevano essere assemblati solo prima di essere messi sulla rampa.

Il Malafon era progettato per la guerra antisommergibile a medio e lungo raggio. Poteva anche essere utilizzato, se necessario, contro obiettivi di superficie. Fu esclusivamente costruito per la marina francese, che lo imbarcò sulle seguenti unità navali: 
  • due fregate Suffren, 
  • 3 fregate Tourville, 
  • 5 navi di scorta T47 Revised tipo ASM On Estrées, 
  • Nave La Galissonnière, 
  • fregata tipo F65 Aconit.


ENGLISH

The MALAFON (contraction of MArine LAtécoère FONd) was developed to respond to the detection capabilities of submarines, which increased significantly with the arrival of the towed sonar. 
Since torpedoes, mortars and other rocket launchers have a very limited range, it was decided to develop a missile equipped with an ASW torpedo.
Studies began to respond to the program. Numerous launches were carried out in the test centre at Ile du Levant and on the Ile d'Oléron. After the operational tests carried out on the ship La Galissonnière, the system entered service in the National Marine in 1966: it was the first national design missile used by the French Navy.
Its use stopped in 1997 and it was replaced by the Lynx helicopter, which replaced it in submarine hunting. Its designated successor, the Milas, will never enter service in the Marine Nationale as France withdrew from the program in 1998 leaving the project to Italy.
The Malafon is shaped like a glider, the front of which is a conventional L4 anti-submarine torpedo.
It was installed on a circular mobile ramp and launched with a 15° elevation towards the designated target. It was operated during the first 4 seconds of flight by a double booster, released once it reached a speed of 230 meters per second (828 km / h) and an altitude of 200 meters. The missile ended its suspended run, stabilized at altitude by an autopilot. Near the target, the opening of a parachute suddenly slowed down the weapon and caused the torpedo to separate and, guided by its own active sonar, launched itself in search of the hostile target, describing a spiral underwater trajectory.
During its flight, the Malafon could receive, via radio link, course correction elements designed to keep it in the desired direction. These elements were processed by a computer, superimposing the position of the submarine provided by sonar and that of the missile transmitted by surface surveillance or firing radar. A luminous light, at the ends of each wing, facilitated visual control of the trajectory.

The very cumbersome structure of the anti-submarine weapon system only allowed boarding on ships of a certain tonnage.
The ASW system included:
  • electronic equipment partly located in the operations center;
  • a remote-controlled launch pad that could be rotated in a circular fashion;
  • a massive maintenance deck depot that could hold 13 missiles that had to be disassembled and assembled only before being put on the ramp.

The Malafon was designed for medium and long-range anti-submarine warfare. It could also be used, if necessary, against surface targets. It was built exclusively for the French navy, which embarked it on the following vessels: 
  • two Suffren frigates, 
  • 3 Tourville frigates, 
  • 5 escort vessels T47 Revised type ASM On Estrées, 
  • Ship La Galissonnière, 
  • frigate type F65 Aconit.


(Web, Google, Wikipedia, You Tube)